Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 Completed N=150 Randomized Treatment

A Safety and Efficacy Trial of a Treat and Extend Protocol Using Ranibizumab With and Without Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01934556 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
150
Serious AEs
58.0%
Results posted
Nov 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Mean Change in Vision at 24 Months — 72.5; 75.0; 75.0 units on a scale

Summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine if a "Treat and Extend" regimen (increasing the time between visits when the disease is stable and not getting worse) of Ranibizumab 0.3 mg injections inside the eye is safe and effective at treating patients with swelling of the retina from diabetes.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change in Vision at 24 Months
72.5; 75.0; 75.0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
0; 1; 0; 1; 6; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Intravitreal Injections
25.0; 19.0; 17.0
SECONDARY
Number of Office Visits
25.0; 19.0; 17.0
SECONDARY
Change in Retinal Thickness
149; 151; 196
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes Gaining or Losing Vision
13; 28; 32; 5; 1; 3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes Which Progress to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
1; 2; 2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes Able to Begin Extension Phase Prior to Week 104 End-point Visit.
0; 49; 55
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes With a Secondary or Tertiary Baseline Retinal Thickness
0; 2; 2

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
  • Age > 18 years of age Patient related considerations
  • For sexually active women of childbearing potential, agreement to the use of an appropriate form of contraception (or abstinence) for the duration of the study
  • Although no birth control method is 100% effective, the following are considered effective means of contraception: surgical sterilization, use of oral contraceptives, barrier contraception using either a condom or diaphragm with spermicidal gel, an intrauterine device, or contraceptive hormone implant or patch. A patient's primary care physician, obstetrician, or gynecologist should be consulted regarding an appropriate form of birth control.
  • Ability and willingness to return for all scheduled visits and assessments

Disease related considerations

  • The presence of center-involving diabetic macular edema on clinical exam and SDOCT
  • Best corrected visual acuity in the study eye, using ETDRS testing, between 20/25 and 20/320 (Snellen equivalent), inclusive.
  • Clear ocular media and adequate pupillary dilation to permit good quality fundus imaging.

Exclusion Criteria

  • General Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy (positive urine pregnancy test) or lactation.
  • Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception. The following are considered effective means of contraception: surgical sterilization or use of oral contraceptives, barrier contraception with either a condom or diaphragm in conjunction with spermicidal gel, an IUD (Intrauterine Device) , or contraceptive hormone implant or patch.
  • Any other condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated
  • Participation in another simultaneous medical investigation or trial

Ocular Exclusion Criteria Prior Ocular Treatment

  • History of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye on clinical exam
  • History of vitrectomy surgery, submacular surgery, or other intraocular surgical intervention for diabetic macular edema in the study eye
  • Any previous intravitreal drug delivery (e.g., intravitreal corticosteroid injection, anti-VEGF drugs including ranibizumab, or device implantation) in the study eye within 90 days of the screening visit.
  • History of prior laser macular photocoagulation more than 90 days prior to screening will be eligible for study inclusion. However, if the investigator does not feel that additional laser photocoagulation can be safely performed or would benefit the patient, then the eye in consideration will be excluded.
  • Evidence of vitreomacular interface abnormality or epiretinal membranes which may be responsible for macular edema

Concurrent Ocular Conditions

  • Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye (e.g., cataract or macular degeneration) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could either: Require medical or surgical intervention during the 24-month study period to prevent or treat visual loss that might result from that condition; or if allowed to progress untreated, could likely contribute to loss of at least 2 Snellen equivalent lines of BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity) over the 24-month study period.
  • Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye
  • Current vitreous hemorrhage in the study eye
  • History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole (Stage 3 or 4) in the study eye
  • Active infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye
  • Aphakia or absence of the posterior capsule in the study eye
  • Intraocular surgery (including cataract surgery) in the study eye within 3 months preceding Day 0
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as IOP (Intraocular Pressure) ≥ 30 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication)
  • History of glaucoma-filtering surgery in the study eye
  • History of corneal transpl
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01934556). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search