Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=1,085 Randomized Health Services Research

Comparative Effectiveness of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointment Models

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03590041 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,085
Serious AEs
Results posted
Apr 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Diabetes Distress - Change in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) — 1.9; 1.9 score on a scale — p=0.04

Summary

In this study, the investigators will compare the effectiveness of patient-driven diabetes Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs) to standardized diabetes SMAs. The curriculum to be used is Targeted Training for Illness Management (TTIM), a 6-session modular group intervention for chronic illness self-management, and has been tested in diabetes. The standardized group visit model will consist of diabetes SMAs with the full TTIM 6-session curriculum, led by a health educator.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Diabetes Distress - Change in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)
1.9; 1.9 0.04 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Patient HbA1c
7.8; 7.9 0.82

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients must be:
  • at least 18 years old,
  • have Type II Diabetes, and
  • receive care in a participating practice.
  • For a practice to be eligible, they must be;
  • a Federally Qualified Health Center,
  • a private primary care practice, or
  • Community Mental Health Center with primary care,
  • They need to have
  • a current panel of at least 150 adult patients with Type 2 Diabetes, and
  • access to health educators, Behavioral Health Professionals, and diabetes peer mentors.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Are currently pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next six months,
  • Have limited cognitive ability due to dementia or a developmental disorder,
  • Less than one year of life expectancy, or
  • Plan to leave the area in the next year.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03590041). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search