Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Complement-targeted therapies show clinical activity in C3G and aHUS including 68% reduction in proteinuriaNewer therapies show promise for rare kidney and blood conditions

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that while newer complement inhibitors show promising renal outcomes, evidence for anti-C5 therapy remains low-certainty.

This narrative synthesis evaluates the efficacy of complement-targeted therapies, including anti-C5 therapy and factor B inhibition, in patients with C3G and aHUS. The review synthesized data from 38 studies to assess outcomes such as hematologic remission, renal recovery, and TMA-free status.

Key findings include a 68% reduction in proteinuria for pegcetacoplan and a 71% C3c clearance on biopsy. For iptacopan, a 35.1% relative reduction in UPCR was reported (P = 0.0014). While anti-C5 therapy is associated with hematologic remission in aHUS, the authors note that causal inference for this treatment is limited by a lack of randomized or concurrent controlled data.

The review identifies several limitations, including selection bias and confounding by indication in real-world cohorts. Furthermore, evidence for terminal complement blockade specifically in C3G remains weak. These findings inform clinical practice following recent FDA approvals but underscore the need for biomarker-guided selection to optimize treatment choice.

How this fits prior evidence

This synthesis extends previous coverage of eculizumab for aHUS by providing specific outcome data for newer agents like iptacopan and pegcetacoplan. It also builds upon the broad scope of complement pathways in kidney diseases by offering specific metrics, such as a 68% reduction in proteinuria with pegcetacoplan and 35.1% relative reduction in UPCR with iptacopan.

Living with rare conditions like C3 glomerulopathy or atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome can be incredibly difficult. These diseases affect the kidneys and blood, often requiring complex management. Recent research looks at how different types of targeted therapies are performing for these patients.

One type of treatment, anti-C5 therapy, showed positive results in helping patients with certain blood issues reach a state where they were free from specific complications. Other newer drugs like iptacopan and pegcetacoplan also showed promise. For example, one study showed a 68% reduction in protein in the urine for those taking pegcetacoplan, while another showed a 35.1% reduction with iptacopan.

While these results are encouraging, it is important to note that much of the evidence for some treatments comes from non-randomized studies. This means we cannot be certain about exactly how well they work for everyone just yet. Some drugs also carry risks, such as serious infections. Because every patient is unique, doctors will need to use these findings to help decide which treatment fits a specific person's needs.

What this means for you:
Newer targeted therapies show promising results in reducing protein in the urine and managing blood conditions.

Common questions

How effective are these new treatments for kidney issues?

Some studies show positive results. For example, one study showed a 68% reduction in protein in the urine for patients taking pegcetacoplan. Another study using iptacopan showed a 35.1% relative reduction in protein in the urine. These findings help doctors choose the best path forward for managing kidney health.

Are these new medications safe to use?

While these treatments can be effective, they do carry risks. One serious risk identified in reports is a serious meningococcal infection. Because safety and effectiveness can vary based on the specific drug used, you should discuss potential side effects and risks with your doctor.

How certain are the results for these treatments?

Some of the evidence is currently limited. For example, the data for anti-C5 therapy lacks randomized controlled trials, making it harder to draw firm conclusions. Additionally, evidence for some specific types of blockade in C3G remains weak. Your doctor can help interpret what these results mean for your specific condition.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) are rare complement-mediated kidney diseases with differing injury sites and therapeutic targets. We conducted a time-limited rapid systematic review to synthesize clinical evidence on complement-targeted therapies. Rapid reviews streamline traditional systematic review methods to provide timely evidence for decision-making in situations where new regulatory approvals or clinical developments create an urgent need for synthesized evidence. The abbreviated timeframe was chosen to inform clinical practice following the March 2025 FDA approval of iptacopan and the July 2025 FDA approval of pegcetacoplan for C3G, at a time when clinicians required timely guidance on emerging therapeutic options. Seven databases were searched from inception to 24 April 2026, supplemented by Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and congress abstracts. Chinese databases were searched post hoc; no additional eligible studies were identified. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or JBI checklist; certainty of evidence was summarized using GRADE. Narrative synthesis without meta-analysis was performed due to substantial heterogeneity. Thirty-eight studies were included (14 C3G, 22 aHUS, 2 both). In aHUS, uncontrolled observational evidence indicates that anti-C5 therapy is associated with haematologic remission in many patients, but causal inference is limited by lack of randomized or concurrent controlled data. The largest prospective single-arm study (Legendre et al. n = 37) reported 80% TMA-free status at 26 weeks. Real-world cohorts corroborated these findings, though estimates are subject to selection bias and confounding by indication. In C3G, eculizumab showed heterogeneous responses. The APPEAR-C3G trial (Kavanagh et al. n = 74) demonstrated that iptacopan achieved a 35.1% relative reduction in 24 h urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at 6 months vs. placebo (P = 0.0014). The VALIANT trial (Fakhouri et al. n = 124), now published in the New England Journal of Medicine, reported that pegcetacoplan reduced proteinuria by 68% at 26 weeks vs. placebo and achieved C3c clearance on biopsy in 71% of patients. Serious meningococcal infection remains a major safety concern. Based on low-certainty, non-randomized evidence, anti-C5 therapy in aHUS is associated with haematologic remission and renal recovery. In C3G, terminal complement blockade evidence remains weak, whereas factor B inhibition has emerging randomized evidence for short-term proteinuria reduction. Biomarker-guided patient selection and standardized outcomes should be priorities. This review employed narrative synthesis without meta-analysis; readers should not interpret reported percentages as pooled estimates. CRD420261364711 (rapid registration, 9 April 2026).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.