Meta-analysis of immersive motor-cognitive VR for global cognition in adults with cognitive frailty
This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of immersive motor-cognitive virtual reality (VR) interventions compared with non-VR control conditions for adults diagnosed with cognitive frailty. The pooled analysis encompassed a total sample size of 344 participants. The primary outcome assessed was global cognition, with physical frailty severity as a secondary outcome.
The meta-analysis reported a significant improvement in global cognitive function, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.50 (95% CI 0.14–0.85). Regarding frailty severity, the analysis demonstrated reductions with a mean difference (MD) of -0.26 (95% CI -0.47 to -0.04). Safety data, including adverse events and tolerability, were not reported in the included studies.
The authors highlight several limitations, specifically the small number of trials included and substantial variation in VR systems and intervention protocols. Consequently, the certainty of the evidence remains limited. Clinicians should interpret these findings with caution, recognizing that the current data do not yet support broad implementation without further high-quality research to address heterogeneity in protocols.