Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Scoping review maps knowledge graph technology research landscape in nursing healthcare fields

Scoping review maps knowledge graph technology research landscape in nursing healthcare fields
Photo by Walls.io / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that knowledge graph research in nursing is dominated by education scenarios with scarce clinical validation.

This scoping review examines the research landscape of knowledge graph applications in nursing across 30 studies in healthcare field settings. The authors categorize the evidence maturity framework distribution, identifying that 12 studies (40%) are in the Construction Phase, 6 studies (20%) in the System Performance Evaluation Phase, 8 studies (26.7%) in the Usability Evaluation Phase, 1 study (3.3%) in the Preliminary Application Phase, and 3 studies (10%) in the Application Phase.

Regarding research focus distribution, the review indicates that studies on nursing education scenarios dominated the literature. Conversely, studies on clinical nursing scenarios were relatively scarce, highlighting a distinct domain bias within the existing body of work.

The authors acknowledge several limitations, including the lack of literature that systematically sorts out the overall research landscape from a macro perspective. Furthermore, there is no objective validation of the clinical application effects of these technologies. The review concludes that these insights should inform subsequent in-depth research and practical applications.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The application of knowledge graph technology in the healthcare field is increasingly in-depth, yet there is a lack of literature that systematically sorts out the overall research landscape of its application in nursing from a macro perspective. This study aimed to systematically depict the research panorama of knowledge graph applications in nursing, stratify existing studies by stages through the construction of an exploratory evidence maturity framework, reveal structural gaps and translation barriers, and provide insights for subsequent in-depth research and practical applications. This study adopted the Arksey scoping review reporting framework and followed the PRISMA-ScR checklist for reporting. We systematically searched databases including Wanfang, CNKI, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, and summarized and analyzed the included articles. The research results were comprehensively collated and divided into five phases: the Construction Phase, System Performance Evaluation Phase, Usability Evaluation Phase, Preliminary Application Phase, and Application Phase. A total of 30 studies were included, with methodological studies as the main research design (n = 15), covering themes such as nursing education, disease management, health education, clinical nursing decision support, risk prediction, and psychological support. Analysis based on the evidence maturity framework showed that there were 12 studies (40%) in the knowledge graph Construction Phase, six (20%) in the System Performance Evaluation Phase, eight (26.7%) in the Usability Evaluation Phase, one (3.3%) in the Preliminary Application Phase, and three (10%) in the Application Phase. The research focus exhibited obvious domain bias: studies on nursing education scenarios dominated, while those on clinical nursing scenarios were relatively scarce. Knowledge graph research in nursing is still in the exploratory stage, dominated by evidence on technical construction, with no objective validation of its clinical application effects. Future research should adopt an evidence-driven approach, focusing on clinical application, optimizing study design and advancing data standardization, thereby enabling knowledge graphs to deliver evidence-based support in nursing practice.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.