Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review of 68 articles shows systemic factors drive 51% of coal industry occupational accident risks.

Systematic review of 68 articles shows systemic factors drive 51% of coal industry occupational acci…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider systemic resilience over behavioral compliance to address 51% of coal logistics accident risks.

This systematic review analyzes 68 peer-reviewed articles to identify occupational accident risks and synthesize risk management practices within the coal industry's post-extraction supply chain, covering transportation, handling, and storage. The study contrasts a systemic perspective against conventional linear attribution of accidents to individual negligence or isolated risk assessments. The primary outcome focuses on categorizing the nature of these risks and existing management practices.

The analysis reveals that human and organizational risk factors constitute the predominant hazard category, representing 51% of the identified risks. Mechanical and operational failures follow as a hazard category at 31%, while environmental and geological hazards account for 18%. The authors highlight a significant geographical concentration of the research in China, which comprises 66% of the included studies and influences the dominant risk management narrative.

The authors argue that effective accident prevention necessitates a paradigm shift from behavioral compliance to systemic resilience. They observe that recurrent 'unsafe acts' are frequently symptoms of deeper systemic deficiencies within the socio-technical environment, including excessive workload and psychosocial stress. A limitation acknowledged by the authors is the significant geographical concentration of research in China (66%), which influences the dominant risk management narrative. Safety data, including adverse events, were not reported in the source material.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Occupational safety research in the coal industry has traditionally prioritized extraction hazards. Consequently, the complex, interconnected risk landscape of the post-extraction supply chain, encompassing transportation, handling, and storage, remains fragmented. Addressing this gap requires a shift from isolated risk assessments to a more holistic approach. This study adopts a systemic perspective to systematically identify occupational accident risks and synthesize risk management practices specifically within coal logistics operations. Guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework, a systematic review of 68 peer-reviewed articles published between 2004 and 2025 was conducted to map these systemic interdependencies. Thematic analysis indicates that ‘Human and Organizational Risk Factors’ constitute the predominant hazard category (51%), followed by ‘Mechanical and Operational Failures’ (31%) and ‘Environmental and Geological Hazards’ (18%). Crucially, a systemic synthesis of the findings challenges the conventional linear attribution of accidents to individual negligence. Results demonstrate that recurrent ‘unsafe acts’ are frequently symptoms of deeper systemic deficiencies within the socio-technical environment, including excessive workload and psychosocial stress. Furthermore, the review identifies a significant geographical concentration of research in China (66%), which influences the dominant risk management narrative toward top-down safety management systems and state-led intelligent automation. While technical hazards such as conveyor deviation and spontaneous combustion are universally applicable, organizational strategies require systemic adaptation across different regulatory contexts. The study concludes that effective accident prevention necessitates a paradigm shift from behavioral compliance to systemic resilience, advocating for the integration of advanced engineering controls with proactive, system-wide psychosocial risk management.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.