This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed mode versus ventilation volume-guaranteed mode in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis in the prone position. The study included 24 patients in the volume-guaranteed group and 27 in the pressure-controlled group, all managed in the intensive care unit setting.
The primary outcomes showed that peak airway pressure and dynamic lung compliance were significantly reduced in the pressure-controlled group. Additionally, arterial PaCO2 and the arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient were lower with pressure-controlled ventilation. However, oxygenation, hemodynamic variables, and total lung ultrasound scores were comparable between the two ventilation modes.
The authors did not explicitly report limitations, adverse events, or funding sources. The small sample size and lack of long-term follow-up data should be considered when interpreting these findings.
Clinically, pressure-controlled ventilation may offer advantages in reducing airway pressure and improving carbon dioxide clearance during prone spinal surgery, but the comparable oxygenation and lung ultrasound scores suggest no clear superiority in overall pulmonary outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess clinical impact.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Posterior spinal fusion surgery for thoracolumbar scoliosis in the prone position, places the patient at high risk of pulmonary complications. The pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed mode regulates the inspiratory pressure limits to achieve a set tidal volume with the lowest airway pressure. We hypothesised that pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed mode would result in improved pulmonary mechanics, gas exchange and lower incidence of atelectasis than ventilation volume-guaranteed mode in patients undergoing corrective surgery for scoliosis in the prone position.
METHODS: Patients of thoracolumbar scoliosis scheduled for posterior spinal fusion surgery were randomly allocated to the ventilation volume-guaranteed (n = 24) or pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed group (n = 27). As primary endpoints, peak airway pressure (Ppeak), dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) and arterial blood gas parameters were evaluated at predefined time points. Screening for atelectasis was done by lung ultrasonography on intensive care unit arrival.
RESULTS: Pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed resulted in significantly reduced Ppeak and Cdyn as well as lower PaCO and arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient. Both the groups were comparable with regard to oxygenation, hemodynamic variables and total lung ultrasound scores.
CONCLUSION: Pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed confers significant advantages like improved airway mechanics and lower dead space ventilation in patients undergoing corrective surgery for scoliosis.