Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Transoral endoscopic surgery for T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma results in a 22.0% positive margin rateSurgery for throat cancer shows 22 percent positive margin rate

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note a 22.0% positive margin rate in T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma following transoral endoscopic surgery.

This meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes of transoral endoscopic surgery, including conventional laser and robot-assisted techniques, in a cohort of 3281 patients with T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma. The primary finding is a 22.0% positive margin rate for the total T2-T3 cohort (95% CI 17.6 - 27.3). Specifically, the positive margin rate was 22.4% for T2 tumors and 30.8% for T3 tumors.

Regarding secondary outcomes, a significant association between positive margins and worse oncologic outcomes was identified in 3 out of 8 studies. However, the authors note that the impact of margin status on oncologic outcomes is not consistently reported across all studies. This uncertainty is attributed to challenges in sampling and histopathological assessment.

Clinical application is limited by data heterogeneity regarding the oncologic impact of margin status. While the study identifies a 22% positive margin rate for transoral endoscopic resection in T2-T3 laryngeal cancer, the definitive impact of these margins on long-term oncologic outcomes remains uncertain. Clinicians should consider these findings as a baseline for surgical outcomes while acknowledging the limitations in histopathological consistency.

When a patient undergoes surgery for laryngeal carcinoma, a key goal is to remove all cancer cells. Doctors look closely at the "margin," which is the edge of the tissue removed. If a margin is positive, it means cancer cells were found right at the edge of the surgical site.

This analysis looked at over 3,000 patients who had transoral endoscopic surgery. The results showed a 22% positive margin rate for the total group. However, the rate was higher for T3 tumors, which were found in 30.8% of cases, compared to 22.4% for T2 tumors.

While the data shows a link between positive margins and worse outcomes in some cases, the evidence is not consistent across all studies. This uncertainty comes from challenges in how samples are collected and examined under a microscope. Because results vary, patients should talk to their doctors about what these margins mean for their specific care.

What this means for you:
About 22% of patients with T2-T3 throat cancer have positive margins after surgery, which may impact outcomes.

Common questions

What is a positive margin in throat cancer surgery?

A positive margin means that cancer cells were found at the very edge of the tissue removed during surgery. In this study of 3,281 patients, the overall positive margin rate was 22%. This means that in about 22% of cases, cancer cells were still present at the surgical boundary.

Does a positive margin make the cancer harder to treat?

The study found a significant association between positive margins and worse outcomes in 3 out of 8 studies. However, because of challenges in how samples are collected and examined, the exact impact of margin status on outcomes is still considered uncertain by experts.

How do T2 and T3 tumors differ in surgery results?

The study found different rates based on the size of the tumor. For T2 tumors, the positive margin rate was 22.4%. For T3 tumors, the rate was higher, at 30.8%. These numbers help doctors understand the risks associated with different stages of laryngeal carcinoma.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 3,281
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Transoral endoscopic surgery, using either conventional laser techniques or supported by robotic assistance, represents an established treatment modality for selected patients with T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma. The goal is complete tumor removal, as positive resection margins have been associated with worse oncological outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the positive margin rate following transoral endoscopic surgery for T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma and to evaluate its impact on oncologic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar was performed from inception through March 2025, identifying studies reporting on surgical margin status after transoral resection of T2 and/or T3 laryngeal carcinoma. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to estimate a pooled positive margin rate. The oncologic impact of margin status is presented descriptively owing to data heterogeneity. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies comprising 3,281 patients with T2-T3 laryngeal carcinoma met the inclusion criteria. The positive margin rate was 22.0% (95% CI 17.6 - 27.3, I = 83.8%) for the total T2-T3 cohort, with stratified rates of 22.4% for T2 and 30.8% for T3 tumors. Among the eight studies assessing the impact of positive margins in T2-T3 stages, three found a significant association with worse oncological outcomes. Conclusion A 22% positive margin rate was identified in T2-T3 laryngeal cancer treated with transoral endoscopic resection. However, the impact of margin status on oncological outcomes remains uncertain, largely due to challenges in sampling and histopathological assessment.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.