New qVCV Test Shows Promise for Hearing Loss Assessment and Aid Benefit Quantification

Purpose: This research sought to develop a low-cognitive-load speech-in-noise test based on consonant confusions with the potential for assessing hearing-aid benefit. Methods: Vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) stimuli with added speech-shaped noise were presented as a closed-set consonant identification task. Initially, consonant-confusion matrices were used to select, from a larger set of consonants and vowel contexts, a set of ten consonants and associated signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) that were sensitive to hearing loss. The sensitivity of the qVCV test to hearing loss was validated by comparing predicted pure-tone average (PTA) hearing thresholds with their audiometric PTA. Clinical viability of the qVCV test was assessed by comparisons to the QuickSIN test. Hearing-aid benefit was assessed by comparing test scores in unaided and aided conditions. Results: The consonants most sensitive to hearing loss were /b d g t k v z s [esh] n/ in the vowel context /[a]/. A cross-validated prediction of PTA had a mean-absolute error of 5.7 dB. The repeatability of qVCV at 50 trials was equivalent to the QuickSIN average of two lists. Hearing-aid benefit was quantified as a decibel reduction in hearing loss. Conclusions: qVCV and QuickSIN performed similarly when test times are equated. The advantages of qVCV include lower cognitive demand, fewer learning eeects, and automated scoring. PTA predicted by qVCV which greatly exceeds audiometric PTA may indicate either cognitive deficits or cochlear neural degeneration. The qVCV quantification of hearing-aid benefit may have clinical value