Film training for Deaf patient care shows age-dependent effects on provider knowledge and competency
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 208 healthcare providers and health professions students to evaluate the efficacy of the Vital Signs film versus standard written guidance (training as usual) for preparing clinicians to serve Deaf patients. Only 52 participants completed all study components and were included in final analyses, with participant age emerging as a key factor in outcomes. The setting and study phase were not reported.
For participants aged 33 years and older, those who viewed the Vital Signs film scored higher on content knowledge compared to same-aged peers who reviewed standard written guidance. However, this older group also scored worse across measures of cultural competency, communication skill, and trust-building abilities compared to their control group peers. For participants younger than 33 years, those who watched the film exhibited greater cultural competence, communication skill, and trust-building abilities than same-aged peers who reviewed standard written guidance. Specific effect sizes, absolute numbers, p-values, and confidence intervals for these comparisons were not reported.
Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events and discontinuations, were not reported. Key limitations include the small final analytic sample (n=52 from 208 enrolled) and the lack of reported statistical significance or effect magnitude for the age-stratified findings. The randomized design suggests causal inference is possible for the observed patterns, but the evidence remains preliminary. Practice relevance is restrained; the authors note future steps include an implementation trial of various Vital Signs training configurations to evaluate strategies for training students versus experienced providers.