This is a narrative review that explores the feasibility of AI-assisted radiotherapy (including auto-contouring, treatment planning support, quality assurance, and workflow optimisation) for patients with pelvic and abdominal malignancies in Africa. The review synthesizes qualitative findings from the literature rather than pooled quantitative data.
The authors report that AI-assisted radiotherapy may improve efficiency and reduce workload, but its clinical impact remains constrained. No effect sizes, p-values, or confidence intervals are reported. The review highlights significant limitations including limited digital infrastructure, workforce shortages, weak data governance, regulatory gaps, poor model generalisability, data bias from non-African training datasets, and fragile IT systems.
The authors do not report on adverse events, serious adverse events, or tolerability. The practice relevance is described as a feasibility-first, phased adoption strategy centred on hybrid AI–human workflows, regional model validation, workforce upskilling, and policy-led governance. The review cautions against overstating clinical impact in African radiotherapy and the potential to act as a capacity multiplier.
View Original Abstract ↓
Cancer care in Africa remains severely limited, with pelvic and abdominal malignancies contributing substantially to the disease burden. Radiotherapy is essential but constrained by infrastructure deficits, workforce shortages, and systemic inequities. Artificial intelligence (AI) may help strengthen radiotherapy through automation and improved workflow efficiency. This narrative review summarises current evidence on AI assisted radiotherapy for pelvic and abdominal cancers in Africa, highlighting feasibility, and regional specific implementation risks. The review shows that AI tools for auto-contouring, treatment planning support, quality assurance, and workflow optimisation can improve efficiency and ease workload when implemented within appropriate clinical and governance frameworks. Their clinical impact in African radiotherapy, however, is constrained by limited digital infrastructure, workforce shortages, weak data governance, regulatory gaps, and poor model generalisability. Additional risks including data bias from non-African training datasets, and fragile IT systems underscore the need for cautious deployment. A feasibility-first, phased adoption strategy centred on hybrid AI–human workflows, regional model validation, workforce upskilling, and policy-led governance offers a safe and practical route for integrating AI into African radiotherapy. When integrated within resilient systems and guided by risk-aware strategies, AI has the potential to act as a capacity multiplier rather than a substitute, offering a more equitable access to high quality radiotherapy across Africa.