This retrospective cohort study examined 86 patients with lung cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer and limited-stage small cell lung cancer, treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy in an Appalachian setting. The study population was drawn from a single institution, and no comparator group was reported. The primary focus was on the incidence and characteristics of cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) occurring during or after treatment.
CVAEs were observed in 51 of the 86 patients, representing an incidence of 59%. The most frequent specific events were non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and pericardial disease, each occurring in 29.4% of the cohort (n=15), followed by arrhythmia in 15.7% (n=8). Patients experiencing CVAEs received a mean heart dose of 13.4 Gy, compared to 9.4 Gy in those without events, though this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.27).
The study developed machine learning prediction models using gradient boosting machines (GBM) and random forests (RF). The GBM model for CVAE prediction achieved an AUC of 0.55 (95% CI 0.44-0.69) with 75% sensitivity. The RF model for mortality prediction showed an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI 0.496-0.750). Safety data regarding discontinuations or specific tolerability metrics were not reported.
Key limitations include the retrospective design and single-institution setting, which restrict generalizability. As an observational study, the association between chemoradiotherapy and CVAEs cannot be interpreted as causal. These results highlight the importance of cardiac dose optimization and machine learning-based risk stratification for cardio-oncology surveillance in similar populations.
View Original Abstract ↓
Background Cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for lung cancer are major concerns in Appalachia due to high rates of smoking and pre-existing cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The objectives of this study were to characterize the incidence of CVAEs in this population and evaluate machine learning (ML) models for CVAEs risk stratification and mortality prediction. Methods A retrospective study was conducted among Appalachian patients with lung cancer treated with definitive CRT at a single institution between 2013 and 2025. Baseline clinical variables, including demographics, smoking status, pre-existing CVD, and post-CRT CVAEs were collected. Heart dosimetric parameters were also obtained. ML models [Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR)] were trained using 5 fold cross validation and evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Feature importance was assessed using permutation analysis. Wilcoxon and Chi-squared tests were used for descriptive comparisons. Results Eighty-six patients (mean age 66 years, 47% male) were included. At diagnosis, 80% (n=69) had NSCLC and 20% (n=17) had LS-SCLC. CVAEs occurred in 51 patients (59%). The most frequent events were NSTEMI (n=15, 29.4%), pericardial disease (n=15, 29.4%), and arrhythmia (n=8, 15.7%). Mean heart dose was higher in the CVAE group (13.4 vs 9.4 Gy, p=0.27). For CVAE prediction, GBM achieved the highest AUC (0.55, 95% CI 0.44-0.69) and sensitivity (75%), while RF showed the highest sensitivity (80%, 95% CI 69-90%). Key predictors included age and cardiac dosimetrists (Heart V20, V40, V50, and mean heart dose). For mortality prediction, RF achieved the highest discrimination (AUC = 0.63, 95% CI 0.496-0.750). Age, cardiac dosimetry, disease stage, and cardiovascular comorbidity were the most influential predictors. Conclusion High incidence of CVAEs occurred among patients with lung cancer treated with CRT in this Appalachian cohort. While ML models demonstrated modest predictive performance, tree-based approaches demonstrated high sensitivity for identifying patients at risk for CVAEs and mortality. Age and cardiac radiation dose metrics consistently emerged as key predictors, highlighting the importance of cardiac dose optimization and ML-based risk stratification for cardio-oncology surveillance.