Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Triple Combination Therapy Improves Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular CarcinomaTrial shows STRIDE plus lenvatinib improves progression-free survival for HCC

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Triple therapy of tremelimumab, durvalumab, and lenvatinib plus TACE significantly improves progression-free survival in HCC.

This Phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a triple-agent regimen consisting of tremelimumab and durvalumab (STRIDE) combined with lenvatinib and TACE. The study enrolled 760 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were not candidates for curative surgery or transplantation but were eligible for TACE.

Primary analysis showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for the triple combination compared to TACE alone. Patients receiving the combination therapy achieved a median PFS of 13.0 months versus 9.8 months in the control group (HR 0.70, p=0.0007). Additionally, the STRIDE plus TACE arm showed a median PFS of 12.9 months compared to 8.1 months for the TACE group.

Regarding safety, the triple combination was associated with a 12% incidence of grade 3 or 4 hypertension. While the median overall survival was numerically higher in the triple therapy group (39.5 months vs 34.7 months), this result did not reach statistical significance at the second follow-up cutoff. The trial suggests that adding lenvatinib to the STRIDE and TACE regimen significantly delays disease progression in HCC patients.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma. While prior evidence noted that durvalumab plus tremelimumab does not improve survival in NSCLC, this study demonstrates a significant progression-free survival improvement in HCC when combined with lenvatinib and TACE. It also provides a different clinical context for the use of the STRIDE combination compared to the prior finding that durvalumab plus tremelimumab shows no significant overall survival benefit compared to durvalumab alone.

Researchers conducted a Phase 3 clinical trial involving 760 adults with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study compared a combination treatment called STRIDE (tremelimumab and durvalumab) plus lenvatinib and TACE against TACE alone. The goal was to see if adding these specific medications could improve outcomes for patients who were not candidates for surgery or transplants.

The results showed that patients receiving the STRIDE, lenvatinib, and TACE combination had a median progression-free survival of 13.0 months, compared to 9.8 months for those receiving TACE alone. This was a statistically significant improvement. While the study also looked at overall survival, the results for that specific measure were not statistically significant at the time of the report.

Safety data showed that 64% of patients in the combination group experienced serious adverse events. Common issues included hypertension, anemia, and post-embolisation syndrome. Because the overall survival data is still being followed, these results are early. Patients should discuss these specific findings and potential side effects with their oncology team to determine the best treatment plan.

What this means for you:
The STRIDE and lenvatinib combination showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival for liver cancer.

Common questions

What did the study find regarding progression-free survival?

The study found that patients receiving the STRIDE, lenvatinib, and TACE combination had a median progression-free survival of 13.0 months. In comparison, those who received TACE alone had a median progression-free survival of 9.8 months. This difference was noted as a statistically significant improvement.

What are the potential side effects of this treatment?

Common serious side effects for the STRIDE and lenvatinib combination included hypertension (12%), post-embolisation syndrome (6%), and anaemia (6%). The trial reported that 64% of patients in the combination group experienced serious adverse events.

How does this treatment compare to TACE alone?

The combination of STRIDE, lenvatinib, and TACE showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to TACE alone. However, the difference in overall survival between the two groups was not statistically significant at the time of the report.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 293
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), a standard treatment for embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), induces tumour immune responses. Single tremelimumab regular interval durvalumab (STRIDE) is a standard treatment in advanced HCC. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of STRIDE, with or without lenvatinib, plus TACE, in participants with embolisation-eligible HCC. METHODS: EMERALD-3 is a phase 3, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded study, conducted at 177 medical sites in 21 countries. Eligible participants were 18 years or older (aged ≥21 years in Egypt or Singapore) at screening and had confirmed HCC (by imaging or histopathologically from biopsy specimen, surgery, or both) not amenable to curative surgery, curative ablation, or transplantation but amenable to TACE. Participants had Child-Pugh class A liver function, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and at least one measurable target intrahepatic lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, STRIDE plus TACE, or TACE until each group reached its preplanned enrolment target of 175 participants. After the STRIDE plus TACE group reached its enrolment target, randomisation was adjusted to continue in a 1:1 ratio between the STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE group and TACE group until approximately 275 participants were enrolled in each of these two groups. Randomisation used a centrally assigned interactive response technology system, stratified by region, baseline tumour burden, and previous palliative embolisation. In the STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE group, on the first day, participants were given 300 mg tremelimumab intravenously, followed by 1500 mg durvalumab plus oral lenvatinib (8 mg for <60 kg bodyweight or 12 mg for ≥60 kg bodyweight); participants then received 1500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks plus once-daily lenvatinib for up to 36 cycles. In the STRIDE plus TACE group, participants were given 300 mg tremelimumab and 1500 mg durvalumab intravenously on the first day, followed by 1500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks. The technique and number of TACE procedures were at the investigators' discretion, with the first procedure administered at least 7 days after the first dose of durvalumab in the two investigation treatment groups and within 7 days of random allocation in the TACE group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus TACE. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus TACE and progression-free survival and overall survival for STRIDE plus TACE versus TACE. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05301842), with enrolment completed. FINDINGS: From March 28, 2022, to Nov 20, 2024, 1124 participants were screened. The full analysis set comprised 760 participants, who were randomly allocated to STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE (n=293), STRIDE plus TACE (n=175), or TACE (n=292). 633 (83%) participants were male and 127 (17%) were female; 548 (72%) were Asian. At the first data cutoff (Sept 2, 2025); the overall median follow-up for progression-free survival was 10·0 months (IQR 4·6-17·2); median follow-up for progression-free survival was 11·0 months (IQR 4·8-18·4) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 8·3 months (4·1-15·5) for TACE. Median progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 12·2-16·7) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus 9·8 months (8·0-11·4) for TACE (HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·57-0·86]; p=0·0007). At the second data cutoff (Feb 23, 2026) and a median follow-up for overall survival of 24·6 months (IQR 16·5-31·5) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 22·9 months (14·9-30·2) for TACE, median overall survival was 39·5 months (95% CI 34·1-not reached) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 34·7 months (28·8-not reached) for TACE (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·65-1·09]; p=0·18). At this data cutoff, median progression-free survival was 12·9 months (95% CI 10·2-15·9) for STRIDE plus TACE and 8·1 months (6·5-10·2) for the first 175 participants randomised to TACE (HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·56-0·91]), with median follow-up of 10·3 months (IQR 4·6-23·7) for STRIDE plus TACE and 7·7 months (3·0-18·5) for the first 175 participants randomly allocated to TACE. The most common adverse events of maximum grade 3 or 4 were hypertension (34 [12%] of 287) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, post-embolisation syndrome and anaemia (ten [6%] of 175 each) for STRIDE plus TACE, and post-embolisation (17 [6%] of 290) for TACE. 184 (64%) participants receiving STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, 89 (51%) receiving STRIDE plus TACE, and 68 (23%) receiving TACE had serious adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events with an outcome of death during the treatment-emergent period occurred in seven (2%) of 287 participants who received STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE (two for myocarditis; and one each for hepatic failure, haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, septic shock, cardiac failure, and unknown cause), none of 175 participants who received STRIDE plus TACE, and two (1%) of 290 participants who received TACE (one each for acute myocardial infarction and unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE showed a statistically significant progression-free survival improvement versus TACE. These findings support a STRIDE-based regimen as a potential new treatment option for people with embolisation-eligible HCC; additional follow-up is being conducted for final analysis of overall survival across treatment groups. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.