Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus irinotecan and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to prior chemotherapyA New Second-Line Combo Shows Promise for Advanced Colon Cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider trifluridine/tipiracil plus irinotecan and bevacizumab for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, noting high rates of neutropenia.

This multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had progressed on prior fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The study included 60 patients receiving biweekly cycles of oral trifluridine/tipiracil (30 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-5), intravenous irinotecan (150 mg/m²), and intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg). The median follow-up duration was 6.6 months.

Primary and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS). The ORR was 18.3%, representing 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses. The DCR was 83.3%. Median PFS was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.39-8.81), and median OS was 17.3 months (95% CI, 13.55-21.05). Subgroup analysis indicated that patients with prior primary tumor resection had longer median OS (21.9 months) and PFS (8.9 months) compared to those without resection (16.2 months and 5.2 months, respectively; p=0.048 and p=0.004).

Safety analysis reported nausea in 100% of patients, neutropenia in 86.7%, and anemia in 83.3%. Serious adverse events included neutropenia (48.3%) and febrile neutropenia. The study design limits causal inference regarding survival benefits, and the absence of a comparator arm precludes definitive conclusions on relative efficacy. Clinicians should weigh these results against existing standard-of-care options while considering the specific safety profile of this triple therapy.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. When it spreads, or metastasizes, it becomes much more difficult to treat.

The first treatment usually combines several chemotherapy drugs. But cancer is clever. It often finds a way around them.

When that happens, doctors and patients urgently need a strong second option. The search for effective next-line treatments is critical. It’s about finding more time.

The Surprising Shift

The standard second-choice treatment often involves a drug called irinotecan. Doctors sometimes combine it with another medication.

But researchers wondered: what if we combined irinotecan with two other drugs instead of one?

They added a pill called TAS-102 and a targeted drug called bevacizumab (Avastin). This created a powerful three-drug attack.

The goal was to see if this new combo could hit the cancer harder when it was most needed.

Think of it like a coordinated assault on a fortress.

First, irinotecan and TAS-102 are both chemotherapy drugs, but they damage cancer cells in different ways. It’s like using two different tools to break down a wall.

Then, bevacizumab joins the fight. It’s a targeted drug. It doesn’t attack the cancer cell directly.

Instead, it starves the tumor. Cancers need a constant supply of blood to grow. Bevacizumab blocks the signals tumors use to build new blood vessels.

No new blood vessels means no new food supply. The cancer’s growth is choked off.

Together, this trio attacks from multiple angles.

A Snapshot of the Trial

From late 2023 to late 2024, 60 patients with mCRC joined this clinical trial. Their first treatment had already stopped working.

They all received the same three-drug combination. Researchers then watched closely. They tracked how the cancer responded and monitored for side effects.

The results are encouraging. For patients who had run out of options, this combo provided a meaningful fightback.

The cancer shrank significantly in 18% of patients. Even more importantly, the disease was controlled—meaning it stopped growing—in over 83% of patients.

For the average patient, the cancer was kept at bay for 6.6 months. This is a crucial measure called progression-free survival.

The most significant result may be overall survival. Patients lived for a median of 17.3 months after starting this second-line treatment.

But there’s a catch.

This doesn’t mean the treatment is available at your local clinic yet.

A Clue for Better Outcomes

The researchers found an interesting clue. Patients who had previously had surgery to remove their original colon tumor did even better.

Their cancer was controlled for nearly 9 months, and they lived for a median of almost 22 months. This suggests managing the original cancer site might be important for long-term success.

It’s a detail doctors will investigate further.

This phase II trial is designed to see if a treatment is promising enough for a larger, definitive test. The strong disease control rate and survival data here have done just that.

They signal that this three-drug strategy is a contender worthy of the next stage of research. It adds a credible new option to the conversation about what to do after first-line treatment fails.

If you or a loved one is facing mCRC, this is a developing story of hope, not an immediate prescription.

The combination is still being studied. It is not an approved standard of care. The most important step is to have an open conversation with your oncologist.

Ask about all available clinical trials, including those looking at new drug combinations like this one. Clinical trials are how today’s promising research becomes tomorrow’s standard treatment.

Understanding the Limits

This was a single-arm phase II trial with 60 patients. This means everyone got the new combo, and there was no group for direct comparison.

Larger phase III trials with a control group are needed to confirm these results. The side effects, while manageable in this study, were common and require careful monitoring by a medical team.

The positive results from this study are a green light for the next phase. The goal now is to launch a larger, randomized phase III trial.

This bigger trial will directly compare this three-drug combo to the current standard second-line treatments. It will seek to definitively prove if this approach is better.

That process takes time—often several years. But for a field that desperately needs more options, this research represents a clear and promising path forward.

Study Details

Study typePhase2
EvidenceLevel 3
Follow-up6.6 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) face a constrained therapeutic landscape following the failure of initial treatment. This multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial (NCT06202001) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel second-line regimen comprising trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Patients with mCRC resistant to prior fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Based on a preceding phase I trial, patients received biweekly cycles of oral TAS-102 (30 mg/m² twice daily, days 1-5), intravenous irinotecan (150 mg/m²), and intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg). The primary outcome measure was the objective response rate (ORR). From October 2023 to August 2024, 60 patients were enrolled. As of December 2024, the ORR was 18.3% (2 complete and 9 partial responses), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 83.3%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.39-8.81), and the median overall survival (OS) was 17.3 months (95% CI, 13.55-21.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that prior resection of the primary tumor was associated with significantly longer median OS (21.9 vs. 16.2 months; p = 0.048) and PFS (8.9 vs. 5.2 months; p = 0.004). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were nausea (100%), neutropenia (86.7%), and anemia (83.3%). The predominant grade 3/4 TRAEs included neutropenia (48.3%), febrile neutropenia (8.3%), and diarrhea (6.7%). In conclusion, the combination of irinotecan, TAS-102, and bevacizumab shows encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile as a second-line therapy for mCRC, meriting further investigation.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.