Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

DOACs prescribed in 89.6% of cases following treatment discontinuation in cancer-associated thrombosisDoctors face inconsistent choices when treating cancer and blood clots

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that DOACs were prescribed in 89.6% of cases following treatment discontinuation in cancer-associated thrombosis.

This observational study conducted a descriptive analysis of 1458 patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism enrolled in the API-CAT trial. The study focused on investigator decisions regarding anticoagulation management following the discontinuation of blinded study treatment.

Following treatment discontinuation, 1260 patients (86.4%) continued therapy. Of those continuing, 790 patients (62.7%) remained on a full dose, while 465 patients (36.9%) were transitioned to a reduced dose. In terms of specific agents, DOACs were prescribed in 89.6% of cases, while low-molecular-weight heparin was prescribed in 9.9% of cases. A total of 198 patients (13.6%) discontinued treatment entirely.

Safety data regarding adverse events or tolerability were not reported. The study is characterized as an exploratory snapshot. The results highlight a therapeutic grey zone where management decisions were not clearly driven by clinical characteristics and varied by physician specialty and country. Clinical application should be interpreted with caution as the study is a descriptive analysis of investigator decisions rather than a trial of clinical outcomes.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis following the cessation of blinded protocols. While prior coverage established that DOACs reduce thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in morbidly obese VTE patients, and that apixaban reduces stroke and systemic embolism in patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation, this study specifically highlights the high frequency of DOAC prescription (89.6%) in the post-blinded phase of cancer-associated thrombosis management.

Managing blood clots in patients with cancer is a complex challenge. Doctors must decide how to manage anticoagulants, which are medications that prevent clots, especially when a patient's treatment plan changes. This study looked at how doctors actually made these decisions for 1,458 patients who had cancer and blood clots.

The data revealed a lack of consistency. While 86.4% of patients continued their blood thinner therapy, the reasons for staying on a full dose versus a reduced dose varied widely. The study found that these decisions were not always based on the specific medical characteristics of the patient. Instead, choices often depended on the doctor's specialty or the country where they practiced.

Because this was an exploratory snapshot, it does not show the final health outcomes for these patients. However, it does highlight a "therapeutic grey zone." This means that while the goal is to keep patients safe, the lack of clear, uniform guidelines can lead to different levels of care depending on who is providing the treatment.

What this means for you:
Treatment decisions for cancer-related blood clots vary significantly based on location and doctor specialty.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 198
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
AIMS: The API-CAT trial demonstrated that reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) was noninferior to full-dose apixaban (5 mg twice daily) for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, while resulting in fewer clinically relevant bleeding events. Although these findings are expected to influence clinical practice, real-world data on physicians' anticoagulation decisions in this setting remain limited. To describe investigators' anticoagulant treatment decisions for patients enrolled in the API-CAT trial after discontinuation of blinded study treatment and prior to trial unblinding and dissemination of results. METHODS AND RESULTS: This descriptive analysis included patients from the prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind API-CAT trial who received at least one dose of study medication. Investigators prospectively documented anticoagulation management following either premature or planned discontinuation of blinded apixaban. Decisions were categorized as treatment discontinuation, continuation at a reduced dose, or continuation at a full dose. Descriptive analyses examined treatment choices according to patient characteristics, cancer features, and contextual factors. Of 1766 randomized patients, 1458 (82.6%) were included in the analysis. After discontinuation of study treatment, anticoagulation was stopped in 198 patients (13.6%) and continued in 1260 (86.4%). Among those continuing therapy, 790 patients (62.7%) received full-dose anticoagulation, 465 (36.9%) received a reduced dose, 5 unknown. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were prescribed in 89.6% of cases, and low-molecular-weight heparin in 9.9%. Treatment decisions were generally consistent across patient and cancer characteristics but varied according to timing of treatment discontinuation, physician specialty, and country. CONCLUSION: Prior to unblinding of the API-CAT trial, treatment decisions appeared poorly driven by clinical characteristics, reflecting a 'therapeutic grey zone' where anticoagulation was continued in most patients but with highly variable dosing. This exploratory snapshot provides a baseline to monitor the anticipated shift towards wider adoption of reduced-dose apixaban for extended anticoagulation following publication of the API-CAT results. The substantial proportion of treatment discontinuation highlights the need for further studies to identify patients who may safely stop therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: API-CAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03692065. COORDINATION: Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, France.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.