Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Talquetamab and teclistamab combination shows 79% response in relapsed multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease.

Talquetamab and teclistamab combination shows 79% response in relapsed multiple myeloma with extrame…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider this combination for high-risk myeloma with extramedullary disease, but note the single-arm design and toxicity burden.

This phase 2 single-arm commentary study evaluated a combination of talquetamab (anti-GPRC5D) and teclistamab (anti-BCMA) in a high-risk population with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and true extramedullary disease. The study included indirect comparisons with CAR-T therapy, but no direct comparator was used. The sample size and study setting were not reported.

Over a median follow-up of 12.6 months, the overall response rate was 79%. The 12-month progression-free survival was 61%. Grade 3–4 infections occurred in 31% of patients, and there were five treatment-related deaths.

Safety findings included a notable toxicity burden, with grade 3–4 infections and treatment-related deaths reported. The tolerability profile may limit real-world implementation outside specialized centers. Discontinuation rates were not reported.

Key limitations include the single-arm design, short follow-up, and indirect comparisons with CAR-T therapy. The practice relevance is limited, as definitive positioning requires randomized data and head-to-head comparisons. The certainty of the evidence is low, and balanced interpretation requires caution.

Study Details

Study typePhase2
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with true extramedullary disease (EMD) remains a critical challenge. The phase 2 RedirecTT-1 study evaluated the combination of two bispecific antibodies, talquetamab (anti-GPRC5D) and teclistamab (anti-BCMA), in this high-risk population. While the reported overall response rate of 79% and 12-month progression−free survival of 61% are promising, a balanced interpretation requires caution. The single−arm design, short follow−up (12.6 months), and indirect comparisons with CAR−T therapy preclude definitive conclusions about comparative effectiveness. Notably, grade 3–4 infections occurred in 31% of patients, with five treatment−related deaths – a toxicity burden that may limit real−world implementation outside specialized centers. Responses were observed after prior BCMA−directed CAR−T therapy, but heterogeneity within this subgroup (time from CAR−T to progression ranging from 98 to 1030 days) tempers enthusiasm for universal sequencing strategies. Key unresolved questions include optimal sequencing with CAR−T, mechanisms of resistance, predictive biomarkers, and the feasibility of delivering this intensive regimen in routine practice. This commentary argues that dual bispecific therapy is a potent but still investigational option for EMD, and its definitive positioning requires randomized data and head−to−head comparisons.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.