Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Dose-dense temozolomide shows no significant difference in progression-free survival compared to standard radiotherapyTrial Shows Temozolomide and Radiation Offer Similar Results for Glioma

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that dose-dense temozolomide does not improve progression-free survival over standard radiotherapy in most LGG subtypes.

This Phase III randomized controlled trial enrolled 478 patients with clinical high-risk low-grade glioma (WHO grade 2). The study compared dose-dense temozolomide (TMZ; 75 mg/m once daily for 21/28 days, up to 12 cycles) against standard radiotherapy (RT; 28 x 1.8 Gy).

The primary outcome, progression-free survival, showed no significant difference between the study arms. Similarly, overall survival (OS) showed no significant difference between the two treatment groups.

Subgroup analyses provided more specific data. In astrocytoma, IDHmt/1p/19q noncodeleted, median OS was similar at 6.6-6.7 years (p =.93). In oligodendroglioma, IDHmt/1p/19q codeleted, OS was 12.9 years for RT versus 14.9 years for TMZ (HR 0.88, p =.63). However, in tumors without IDH mutations, OS was 2.5 years for RT versus 4.7 years for TMZ (HR 0.47, p =.0068).

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. A noted limitation is that combined-modality therapy was not tested in this trial. The study suggests that molecular classification may be more relevant than age as a prognostic factor in these patients.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses the management of low-grade glioma, which accounts for 57% of mixed-grade glioma surgical cohorts. While the study confirms that systemic options like temozolomide are available, it shows no significant difference in survival for most molecular subtypes compared to radiotherapy, except in IDH-wildtype tumors. This adds to the understanding of treatment options for patients who may face systemic barriers to surgery or other interventions.

A Phase III clinical trial looked at 478 patients with high-risk low-grade glioma (LGG). The study compared a treatment of dose-dense temozolomide (TMZ) against standard radiotherapy (RT) to see which method better improved progression-free survival and overall survival.

The results showed no significant difference between the two treatment groups for the primary outcomes. For specific types of tumors, such as astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma, the survival times were similar between the two methods. However, the study did find a statistically significant difference in tumors without IDH mutations, where temozolomide showed a longer median survival compared to radiation.

Because this trial did not test combined-modality therapy, the results only compare these two treatments individually. While the trial provides high-certainty evidence for these specific comparisons, it is important to note that molecular classification of a tumor is now a key factor in understanding patient outlook. Patients should discuss these specific findings and their unique molecular profile with their medical team.

What this means for you:
The trial found no significant difference between temozolomide and radiation for most low-grade glioma types.

Common questions

How did the two treatments compare for most patients?

The study found no significant difference in progression-free survival or overall survival between the dose-dense temozolomide group and the standard radiotherapy group. This means both treatments performed similarly for the majority of patients with high-risk low-grade glioma in this trial.

Were there any specific cases where one treatment performed better?

In tumors without IDH mutations, the study found a significant difference where temozolomide showed a longer median survival of 4.7 years compared to 2.5 years for radiation. For other types like astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma, the results were similar between both treatments.

What were the limitations of this study?

The study did not test combined-modality therapy, which means it only compared the two treatments separately. Additionally, the results suggest that molecular classification of a tumor is a more important factor for prognosis than age alone.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 178
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up80.4 mo
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: Prognosis in low-grade gliomas (LGGs) remains highly variable, and treatment-related late toxicity is a concern. This trial was comparing single-modality therapies in patients who often survive for years or decades and investigating differential responses according to molecular markers. METHODS: Four hundred seventy-eight patients with clinical high-risk LGG (WHO grade 2) were randomly assigned to standard radiotherapy (RT; 28 × 1.8 Gy) or dose-dense temozolomide (TMZ; 75 mg/m once daily × 21/28 days, up to 12 cycles). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in progression-free survival or overall survival (OS) between study arms. Analyzable tumor tissue in 73% (351/478) of patients allowed for post hoc reclassification according to the 2021 WHO pathologic criteria. In astrocytoma, IDHmt/1p/19q noncodeleted (n = 178), median OS was similar, 6.6-6.7 years irrespective of arm (0.67-1.44, = .93). In oligodendroglioma, IDHmt/1p/19q codeleted (n = 109), median OS was 12.9 years (9.4-not reached) with RT and 14.9 years (10.1-number of events not reached) with TMZ (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88 [0.52-1.49], = .63). In 64 tumors without isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, survival favored the TMZ arm: OS 2.5 (1.8-3.3) versus 4.7 (2.2-7.2) years (HR, 0.47 [0.27-0.82], = .0068). Patients age 40 years and older fared better than patients younger than 40 years, challenging the current notion of age alone as a negative prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: The assigned initial treatment modality did not affect progression-free survival or OS, regardless of the molecular subtype. Combined-modality therapy was not tested in this trial but has since become a standard of care for IDH-mutant astrocytoma. With emerging novel therapeutic options, rational treatment strategies tailored at the individual clinical and pathologic recurrence risk profiles will be needed. The validity of an age cutoff as prognostic factor is challenged when tumors are molecularly classified.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.