Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds oral SERDs improve PFS over standard ET in HR+ HER2- ABC

Meta-analysis finds oral SERDs improve PFS over standard ET in HR+ HER2- ABC
Photo by CDC / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider oral SERDs for HR+ HER2- ABC after ET progression, noting benefit is concentrated in ESR1-mutated tumors.

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) versus standard endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after prior ET. The analysis pooled data from 2,808 patients.

The authors synthesized that oral SERDs improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to standard ET, with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.89). The objective response rate was higher with oral SERDs (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.28), and an improvement in overall survival was observed (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90). The PFS benefit was concentrated in patients with ESR1-mutated tumors (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.67), while no significant advantage was seen in ESR1 wild-type disease.

The authors noted that follow-up was limited and that randomized trials have yielded heterogeneous results with uncertain clinical benefit. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with oral SERDs compared with the control ET.

The practice relevance is that pooled randomized evidence supports a clinically meaningful benefit of oral SERDs over standard ET after endocrine progression in this population. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution given the noted limitations.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 2,808
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: The development of endocrine resistance is frequent in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (HR + /HER2-ABC), particularly after CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure. Next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) have been developed to improve estrogen receptor blockade; however, randomized trials have yielded heterogeneous results with uncertain clinical benefit. METHODS: A PRISMA 2020 compliant systematic review and meta-analysis with PROSPERO registration was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through October 2025 for phase II-III randomized trials comparing oral SERDs with standard endocrine therapy (ET) in HR + /HER2-ABC after prior ET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Treatment effects were pooled using random effects models with prespecified subgroup analyses by ESR1 mutation status and key clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Six randomized trials, including 2808 patients, were analyzed. Oral SERDs improved PFS versus standard ET in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.89). ORR was higher with oral SERDs (odds ratio [OR] 1.67; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.28), corresponding to absolute response rates of approximately 21% versus 14%. An OS improvement was observed (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90), although follow-up was limited. Benefit was concentrated in ESR1-mutated tumors (PFS, HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.67) with no significant PFS advantage in ESR1 wild-type disease. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with oral SERDs compared with the control ET. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled randomized evidence supports a clinically meaningful benefit of oral SERDs over standard ET after endocrine progression in HR + /HER2-ABC, with the strongest and most consistent efficacy observed in ESR1-mutated disease.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.