Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Histology-derived gene-expression signatures predict distant recurrence-free interval and chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer cohorts.

Histology-derived gene-expression signatures predict distant recurrence-free interval and chemothera…
Photo by Logan Voss / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that histology-derived signatures predict distant recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer, though safety data are missing.

This multi-cohort study assessed the prognostic performance of histology-derived gene-expression signatures derived from routine hematoxylin and eosin slides in patients with early breast cancer. The analysis pooled data from CALGB 9344, CALGB 9741, a pooled Chicago real-world cohort, and the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Studies-II and -3, involving a total sample size of 7170 patients. These signatures were compared against clinical factors to evaluate their ability to predict distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and other survival outcomes.

The signatures showed strong prognostic performance for 5-year DRFI in CALGB 9344 with a C-index of 0.63 and performed well in CALGB 9741 (C-index 0.60), the Chicago cohort (C-index 0.70), and the ACS cohort (C-index 0.62). The study also evaluated treatment interactions, finding that high-risk cases in CALGB 9344 receiving taxane therapy experienced a greater benefit with a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.88; interaction p=0.028).

In CALGB 9741, high-risk cases receiving dose-dense chemotherapy showed a greater benefit with a hazard ratio of 0.69 (95% CI 0.56-0.85; interaction p=0.039). Conversely, the Chicago cohort demonstrated differential chemotherapy benefit with a hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% CI 0.59-1.21; interaction p=0.009). The signatures successfully identified low-risk groups with a 2%-10% risk of distant recurrence or breast cancer death. Safety, tolerability, and adverse events were not reported in this analysis.

The practice relevance suggests that histology-derived signatures from H&E images are broadly prognostic and may predict chemotherapy benefit unlike clinical factors alone. However, the study design was observational, and causality was not reported. The lack of reported safety data and the observational nature of the evidence limit definitive clinical recommendations regarding the adoption of these signatures for routine decision-making.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
Sample sizen = 7,170
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Purpose: To test whether histology-derived gene-expression signatures from routine hematoxylin and eosin slides are prognostic for recurrence and predictive of chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer. Methods: We conducted a multi-cohort study including CALGB 9344 (anthracycline +/- paclitaxel), CALGB 9741 (standard vs dose-dense chemotherapy), a pooled Chicago real-world cohort, and the American Cancer Society (ACS) Cancer Prevention Studies-II and -3. Whole-slide images were processed with a previously described pipeline to generate 61 histology-derived signatures per patient. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), except in ACS, where breast cancer-specific survival was used. Secondary endpoints include distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival. The most prognostic signature in CALGB 9344, selected by Harrell's C-index, was evaluated in additional cohorts. Signature-treatment interaction was assessed by likelihood-ratio tests. Multivariable Cox models incorporating age, tumor size, nodal status, estrogen/progesterone receptor status, and signature were fit in CALGB 9344 to improve risk stratification. Results: A total of 7,170 patients were included across four cohorts. The top histology-derived signature in CALGB 9344 showed strong prognostic performance for 5-year DRFI (C-index 0.63) and performed well across validation cohorts (C-index 0.60, 0.70, and 0.62 in CALGB 9741, Chicago, and ACS, respectively). The strongest predictive signal for treatment benefit was observed for DRFS. High-risk cases identified by the signature demonstrated greater benefit from taxane in CALGB 9344 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.76 for DRFS, 95% CI 0.66-0.88; interaction p=0.028), from dose-dense chemotherapy in CALGB 9741 (aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85; interaction p=0.039), and differential chemotherapy benefit in the Chicago cohort (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.59-1.21; interaction p=0.009). Combined clinical-histology models improved risk stratification and identified low-risk groups with a 2%-10% risk of distant recurrence or breast cancer death. Conclusion: Histology-derived signatures from H&E images are broadly prognostic and, unlike clinical factors, may predict chemotherapy benefit.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.