For people diagnosed with advanced pleural mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lungs that can't be removed by surgery, the question has been whether a newer type of treatment called immunotherapy offers lasting help. This five-year follow-up from a major clinical trial provides an answer. The treatment, a combination of the immunotherapy drugs nivolumab and ipilimumab, continues to show a survival benefit compared to standard chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of over five and a half years, 14% of patients on the immunotherapy combination were alive at five years, compared to 6% of those who started on chemotherapy. This benefit was seen regardless of the specific type of mesothelioma tumor. The study also looked at a potential biomarker—a sign in the blood that might predict who benefits most. They found that patients with lower levels of a certain immune cell type (called M-MDSCs) before treatment tended to do better on the immunotherapy combination. Importantly, the survival advantage for the immunotherapy-first group remained even after the researchers accounted for the fact that nearly a quarter of patients in the chemotherapy group later received immunotherapy. No new safety concerns emerged with longer follow-up. These results confirm that the immunotherapy combination provides a durable, long-term benefit for some patients with this challenging cancer.
Nivolumab+ipilimumab shows 5-year OS benefit (14% vs 6%) vs chemo in unresectable pleural mesotheliomaCan immunotherapy help people with advanced mesothelioma live longer? Five-year results show it can
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This 5-year follow-up analysis from the CheckMate 743 randomized controlled trial evaluated updated efficacy, safety, and biomarker outcomes for first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma. With a median follow-up of 66.8 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated a continued overall survival benefit compared to chemotherapy in all randomly assigned patients, with 5-year OS rates of 14% versus 6% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.88). This benefit was observed regardless of tumor histology. Among biomarker-evaluable patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=242), exploratory analyses showed that high baseline monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell (M-MDSC) levels correlated with worse OS compared to low M-MDSC levels (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.43). A treatment-switching analysis was performed, adjusting for the 24% of patients in the chemotherapy arm who received subsequent immunotherapy; after this adjustment, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate an OS benefit versus chemotherapy (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.78). The study reported no new safety signals. The authors conclude that these results demonstrate long-term, durable clinical benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy, which was preserved even after adjustment for treatment switching in the chemotherapy arm. Exploratory analyses suggested greater benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in the low M-MDSC subgroup. The results further support first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a standard of care for unresectable pleural mesothelioma.