Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Zanubrutinib associated with higher 3-year PFS versus acalabrutinib-venetoclax in treatment-naive CLL

Zanubrutinib associated with higher 3-year PFS versus acalabrutinib-venetoclax in treatment-naive CL…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note zanubrutinib showed higher 3-year PFS versus acalabrutinib-venetoclax in indirect comparison analysis.

This post hoc analysis utilized an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison between phase 3 RCTs. The population included treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma patients without del(17p). Zanubrutinib data came from the SEQUOIA study, while the comparator arm derived from the AMPLIFY study involving acalabrutinib-venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab. The analysis matched patients based on baseline characteristics to reduce confounding.

At 3 years, investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 84.3% for zanubrutinib versus 78.9% for acalabrutinib-venetoclax. In the matched subgroup eligible for fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab, rates were 89.2% versus 78.9%. Adjusted hazard ratios favored zanubrutinib at 0.26 (95% CI 0.13-0.54; P<.0003), and unadjusted at 0.45 (95% CI 0.23-0.88; P=.0197).

Safety data, including adverse events and discontinuations, were not reported in this analysis. The study design is an indirect comparison, meaning association is reported rather than direct causation. Post hoc analysis limitations apply to the evidence strength. Clinicians must recognize that unmeasured confounding may influence outcomes in this non-randomized comparison.

Practice relevance suggests zanubrutinib monotherapy as an effective treatment option for all patients with treatment-naive CLL/SLL. This includes patients who might otherwise be considered for more intensive fixed-duration combination regimens. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the non-randomized nature of the comparison.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up36.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
In the phase 3 randomized SEQUOIA study (NCT03336333), zanubrutinib (arm A) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bendamustine-rituximab (BR; arm B) in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) without del(17p). In the phase 3 AMPLIFY study (NCT03836261), acalabrutinib-venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab demonstrated prolonged PFS vs chemoimmunotherapy (investigator's choice of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab [FCR] or BR) in patients with treatment-naive CLL without del(17p) or TP53 mutations. Compared with AMPLIFY, the patient population in SEQUOIA was unsuitable for FCR and included patients with TP53 mutations. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to investigate the efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients from SEQUOIA vs a clinically similar patient population treated with acalabrutinib-venetoclax in AMPLIFY. A numerically greater 3-year investigator-assessed PFS (PFS-INV) was observed with zanubrutinib (84.3%) in the SEQUOIA population vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax in AMPLIFY (78.9%). When matching SEQUOIA to the AMPLIFY population by FCR eligibility, a greater PFS benefit with zanubrutinib was reported (89.2% vs 78.9%, respectively). To support the comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax, an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was performed, which showed that zanubrutinib was associated with prolonged PFS-INV vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax when adjusted for various baseline characteristics. Zanubrutinib also demonstrated longer PFS whether adjusted for age (PFS-INV hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.54; P< .0003) or unadjusted (PFS-INV HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88; P = .0197). These results highlight zanubrutinib monotherapy as an effective treatment option for all patients with treatment-naive CLL/SLL, including patients who might otherwise be considered for more intensive fixed-duration combination regimens.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.