Zanubrutinib associated with higher 3-year PFS versus acalabrutinib-venetoclax in treatment-naive CLL
This post hoc analysis utilized an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison between phase 3 RCTs. The population included treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma patients without del(17p). Zanubrutinib data came from the SEQUOIA study, while the comparator arm derived from the AMPLIFY study involving acalabrutinib-venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab. The analysis matched patients based on baseline characteristics to reduce confounding.
At 3 years, investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 84.3% for zanubrutinib versus 78.9% for acalabrutinib-venetoclax. In the matched subgroup eligible for fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab, rates were 89.2% versus 78.9%. Adjusted hazard ratios favored zanubrutinib at 0.26 (95% CI 0.13-0.54; P<.0003), and unadjusted at 0.45 (95% CI 0.23-0.88; P=.0197).
Safety data, including adverse events and discontinuations, were not reported in this analysis. The study design is an indirect comparison, meaning association is reported rather than direct causation. Post hoc analysis limitations apply to the evidence strength. Clinicians must recognize that unmeasured confounding may influence outcomes in this non-randomized comparison.
Practice relevance suggests zanubrutinib monotherapy as an effective treatment option for all patients with treatment-naive CLL/SLL. This includes patients who might otherwise be considered for more intensive fixed-duration combination regimens. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the non-randomized nature of the comparison.