Autologous patch versus secondary intent healing for Mohs surgery wounds
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 22 patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery. The intervention was an autologous patch, and the comparator was secondary intent healing. The primary outcome was fully epithelialized wounds on day 19. One wound in the patch group and one wound in the control group were fully epithelialized. Wound area reduction was higher in the patch group but was not significant. Transepidermal water loss decreased to a larger extent in the patch group. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was evaluated at 6 months, but specific results were not reported.
Safety and tolerability were not formally reported, but patch healing appears safe. Key limitations include that wound area reduction was not significant and reflectance confocal microscopy was applied exploratively. The follow-up duration was 6.0 months. The sample size was small, and p-values and confidence intervals were not reported.
Practice relevance is restrained; secondary intent healing is a viable option, and an autologous patch may prompt benefits in certain wound healing factors. The evidence is early and uncertain, and the intervention should not be considered a proven standard.