Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Network meta-analysis compares exercise modalities for quality of life in breast cancer survivors

Network meta-analysis compares exercise modalities for quality of life in breast cancer survivors
Photo by TSquared Lab / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that most exercise modalities except high-intensity interval training and Pilates are associated with improved quality of life.

This systematic review and network meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of different exercise modalities, including combined exercise, Tai Chi, aerobic exercise, Qigong, yoga, resistance training, high-intensity interval training, and Pilates, for improving quality of life in breast cancer survivors after treatment. The analysis included data from 5,294 participants.

The results indicated that all examined exercise modalities, except for high-intensity interval training and Pilates, were associated with significant improvements in quality of life compared with usual care. Specific standardized mean differences (SMD) reported include SMD 1.40 for combined exercise, SMD 0.98 for Tai Chi, SMD 0.79 for aerobic exercise, SMD 0.77 for Qigong, SMD 0.58 for yoga, and SMD 0.54 for resistance training. For combined exercise, the 95% CI was 0.95 to 1.86.

Ranking of effectiveness using SUCRA values showed combined exercise at 95.4%, Tai Chi at 7ical 5%, aerobic exercise at 63.4%, Qigong at 60.1%, yoga at 45.4%, and resistance training at 42.1%. The study utilized frequentist network meta-analysis to determine which modalities demonstrated superior effectiveness.

These findings offer hierarchical, modality-specific evidence to support personalized exercise prescription in survivorship care. However, the follow-up duration and specific study limitations were not reported in the provided data.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundWith more than 7.8 million breast cancer survivors worldwide and five-year survival rates approaching 90%, optimizing quality of life (QoL) has become a central priority in survivorship care. Exercise is a cornerstone non-pharmacological intervention; however, current guidelines lack modality-specific evidence, and existing meta-analyses often rely on overly broad classifications that obscure clinically meaningful differences among exercise types.MethodsThis systematic review involved comprehensive searches of six electronic databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Scopus) from inception through October 2025. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated how exercise interventions affect QoL in breast cancer survivors. Using frequentist network meta-analysis, we synthesized the evidence to determine which exercise modalities demonstrated superior effectiveness across the included RCTs.ResultsSixty-nine randomized controlled trials involving 5,294 breast cancer survivors from 19 countries met the inclusion criteria. All exercise modalities except high-intensity interval training and Pilates were associated with significant improvements in QoL compared with usual care. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses identified combined exercise as the most effective modality (SMD = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.95–1.86; SUCRA = 95.4%), followed by Tai Chi (SMD = 0.98, SUCRA = 71.5%), aerobic exercise (SMD = 0.79, SUCRA = 63.4%), Qigong (SMD = 0.77, SUCRA = 60.1%), yoga (SMD = 0.58, SUCRA = 45.4%), and resistance training (SMD = 0.54, SUCRA = 42.1%).ConclusionsCombined exercise integrating aerobic and resistance components provides the greatest improvement in QoL among breast cancer survivors. These findings offer hierarchical, modality-specific evidence to support personalized exercise prescription in survivorship care.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251173721, identifier CRD420251173721.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.