Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Darolutamide plus ADT delays pain progression in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancerNew treatment delays pain in advanced prostate cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider darolutamide plus ADT to delay pain progression in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer based on secondary trial analyses.

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial included 669 men aged 18 years or older with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer across 133 centres in 15 countries. Patients received 600 mg darolutamide orally twice daily plus androgen deprivation therapy or matching placebo plus ADT. The primary outcome was radiological progression-free survival.

At a median follow-up of 22.8 months (IQR 12.3-27.4) in the darolutamide group and 20.3 months (11.4-25.2) in the placebo group, darolutamide significantly improved radiological progression-free survival (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.71). Time to pain progression was delayed (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.96), and time to deterioration in FACT-P total score was extended (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.94).

Safety was manageable. Hypertension occurred in 4% of darolutamide and 4% of placebo patients, anaemia in 3% vs 4%, and aspartate aminotransferase increase in 2% vs <1%. Serious adverse events occurred in 24% of both groups. One treatment-related grade 5 event (death) was reported.

These are secondary and exploratory analyses from an ongoing trial. The intention-to-treat population was used for pain and HRQoL outcomes, and all treated patients for safety. Limitations were not reported. The findings support consideration of darolutamide plus ADT as a standard-of-care option in patients with mHSPC.

Pain didn’t spread as fast

Prostate cancer that has spread—called metastatic cancer—often causes pain as it grows in bones or organs. Hormone therapy, also known as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), has long been the first step. It works by cutting off the fuel (male hormones) that feed the cancer. But over time, the cancer often comes back stronger.

Doctors have been adding newer drugs to ADT to keep that from happening. Darolutamide is one of them. It blocks the hormone signal even more completely. Think of it like a second lock on a door. ADT turns off the main key. Darolutamide jams the spare keys.

A clearer path to feeling better

In the past, new drugs were judged mainly by how long they kept cancer from growing on scans. That matters. But so does how a man feels every day. Can he walk the dog? Play with his grandkids? Sleep through the night?

The ARANOTE trial looked closely at those questions. It followed 669 men across 15 countries. All had recently diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Half took darolutamide with ADT. Half took a placebo with ADT.

They answered regular surveys about pain and overall well-being. The surveys used simple scoring tools. One measured worst pain on a 0 to 10 scale. The other asked about energy, mood, and daily function.

Men on darolutamide felt better longer

Here’s what changed. Men taking darolutamide took about 40% longer to see their pain get worse. That means if pain scores went up by two points or more, or if they needed strong painkillers like opioids for a week or more, it happened later.

They also held on to their quality of life longer. Their overall well-being score dropped 24% slower than men on placebo. That 10-point drop in quality of life? It came months later for those on the drug.

These delays may not sound huge. But in cancer care, months of stable symptoms are meaningful. They mean more time with family, fewer hospital visits, and less need for strong pain drugs.

But there’s a catch.

Side effects were mild but still present

Darolutamide didn’t cause major new side effects. Most men handled it well. The most common serious issues were high blood pressure, low red blood cell counts, and minor liver changes. Rates were similar between groups.

One man in the darolutamide group died from a treatment-related cause. The report lists it as “death not otherwise specified,” meaning the exact reason wasn’t clear. This is rare, but it reminds us that even well-tolerated drugs carry some risk.

This doesn’t mean this treatment is available yet.

Experts say the results add strong support for using darolutamide early in treatment. It’s already approved in some countries for this use. But access varies. Cost, insurance rules, and local guidelines can slow adoption.

Also, the trial didn’t compare darolutamide to other similar drugs like enzalutamide or apalutamide. We don’t yet know which works best or causes the fewest side effects.

Not all men respond the same

The study included men of many backgrounds—White, Asian, Black, and others. Results were consistent across groups. But the number of Black men was small. More research is needed to be sure the benefits are the same for all.

The trial also only included men who were fairly healthy otherwise. Those with severe heart or liver disease weren’t enrolled. So we don’t know how well it works for men with other serious conditions.

More time with fewer symptoms

What happens next? Doctors may start offering darolutamide sooner after diagnosis. Guidelines could change within a year. More data will come as the trial continues.

Researchers will also look at whether the drug helps men live longer. That result isn’t ready yet. Survival takes longer to measure.

For now, the message is clear. Adding darolutamide to standard therapy doesn’t just slow cancer on scans. It helps men feel better, longer. And in advanced cancer, that’s a win.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 446
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), darolutamide significantly improved radiological progression-free survival versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·54, 95% CI 0·41-0·71) in the phase 3 ARANOTE study. In addition to survival, symptom control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important factors in treatment decision making; we therefore report pain, HRQoL, and safety outcomes from the ARANOTE trial. METHODS: ARANOTE is an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving men aged 18 years or older, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 and recurrent or de novo mHSPC, treated at 133 cancer centres in 15 countries. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to 600 mg darolutamide or matching placebo orally twice daily, both with investigator's choice of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist, or orchiectomy) starting within 12 weeks before randomisation. Randomisation was stratified by presence versus absence of visceral metastases and by previous versus no previous local therapy. Treatment was assigned centrally using an interactive web response system based on a computer-generated permuted block randomisation list with block sizes of six. The investigators, the participants, and the sponsor remained masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary endpoint (reported previously) was radiological progression-free survival. Here, we assessed time to pain progression (≥2-point increase in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form worst pain score or initiation of opioid for ≥7 days; secondary endpoint) and time to deterioration of overall wellbeing (≥10-point decrease in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate [FACT-P] total score; prespecified exploratory endpoint). Pain and HRQoL outcomes were analysed in the intention to treat population; safety was analysed in all treated patients according to treatment actually received. The trial, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04736199, is ongoing, but no longer recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Feb 23, 2021, and June 14, 2022, 669 patients (all male; 376 [56%] White, 209 [31%] Asian, 65 [10%] Black, 19 [3%] other race) were randomly assigned to receive darolutamide (n=446) or placebo (n=223). At the data cutoff date for the primary analysis (June 7, 2024), the median follow-up duration for the analyses presented here was 22·8 months (IQR 12·3-27·4) in the darolutamide group and 20·3 months (11·4-25·2) in the placebo group. Darolutamide delayed time to pain progression (HR 0·72; 95% CI 0·54-0·96) and extended time to deterioration in FACT-P total score (HR 0·76; 0·61-0·94) versus placebo. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (19 [4%] of 445 patients who received darolutamide vs eight [4%] of 221 patients who received placebo), anaemia (14 [3%] vs eight [4%]), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (ten [2%] vs one [<1%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 105 (24%) versus 52 (24%) patients, respectively. One treatment-related grade 5 event occurred, reported as death (not otherwise specified). INTERPRETATION: Along with the known survival benefits, the clinically meaningful delays in pain progression and time to deterioration of overall wellbeing support consideration of darolutamide plus ADT as a standard-of-care treatment option in patients with mHSPC. FUNDING: Bayer and Orion Pharma.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.