Meta-analysis finds robotic low anterior resection improves outcomes in younger rectal cancer patients

Robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) has been proposed to overcome technical limitations of laparoscopy in rectal surgery. However, previous meta-analyses have evaluated mixed-age populations, and no meta-analysis has specifically investigated younger patients (aged < 65 years) undergoing low anterior resection. This study aimed to compare operative, short-term postoperative, and oncological outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic low anterior resection in this cohort. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA 2020 and the Cochrane Handbook, with prospective registration in Prospero. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2026. Comparative studies evaluating R-LAR versus L-LAR in younger rectal cancer cohorts, defined as studies with mean patient age ≤ 65 years, were included. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB2, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. A total of 16 studies were included. Compared with laparoscopy, R-LAR was associated with longer operative duration (MD 24.59 min, 95% CI 3.85-45.33, p = 0.02, I² = 96%), lower conversion to open surgery (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27-0.53, p < 0.0001, I² = 38%), lower overall complications (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, p = 0.02, I² = 0%), lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.77, p = 0.006, I² = 0%), lower 30-day reoperation (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98, p = 0.04, I² = 0%), higher complete TME rates (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.14-5.10, p = 0.003, I² = 0%) and shorter hospital stay (MD -0.82, 95% CI -1.50 to -0.13, p = 0.02, I²=97%). Estimated blood loss (p = 0.05) and major complications (p = 0.05) were borderline significant in favor of R-LAR. Anastomotic leakage (p = 0.17), postoperative ileus (p = 0.49), time to first flatus (p = 0.12), time to diet initiation (p = 0.10), CRM positivity (p = 0.56), lymph node yield (p = 0.09), local recurrence (p = 0.67), loop ileostomy (p = 0.56), disease-free survival (p = 0.53), and overall survival (p = 0.73) were comparable. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Functional outcomes were insufficient for pooling. Robotic low anterior resection in younger rectal cancer cohorts may improve several perioperative and technical outcomes without compromising oncological adequacy. Further high-quality studies are required to confirm these findings.