Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Circulating protein signature predicts severe immune-related adverse events in relapsed/refractory lymphomaBlood protein test may help predict severe side effects in lymphoma patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider circulating protein signature for risk stratification of severe CRS/ICANS in lymphoma, pending validation.

This cohort study involved 98 relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients from MD Anderson Cancer Center and Moffitt Cancer Center, divided into discovery (n=39) and independent testing (n=59) cohorts. The intervention was a circulating protein signature (5-marker and 8-marker panels) to predict severe immune-related adverse events, compared to a low-risk group as reference. The primary outcome was prediction of Grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).

Main results showed the signature predicted Grade ≥2 CRS with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72-0.98) in the discovery cohort and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63-0.89) in independent testing. For Grade ≥2 ICANS, AUCs were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.51-0.84), respectively. In risk stratification, the high-risk group had increased odds of Grade ≥2 CRS (OR 13.84, 95% CI: 4.21-56.26) and ICANS (OR 8.59, 95% CI: 2.87-29.09) versus the low-risk group.

Safety focused on the adverse events predicted: CRS and ICANS, with serious adverse events defined as Grade ≥2. Limitations include the observational design, which precludes causal inferences, and lack of reported follow-up, discontinuations, or tolerability data. Practice relevance is that protein biomarker panels may help risk-stratify patients for severe CRS and ICANS to guide prophylactic interventions, but this is preliminary and needs further validation.

Doctors studied a new blood test that looks at proteins in the blood to see if it could predict which lymphoma patients might get serious immune side effects. The study included 98 patients with lymphoma that had come back or wasn't responding to treatment. These patients were treated at two cancer centers in the United States.

The researchers found that the blood test could identify patients at higher risk for two types of severe immune reactions: cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (ICANS). Patients in the high-risk group were about 14 times more likely to get severe CRS and about 9 times more likely to get severe ICANS compared to low-risk patients. The test worked reasonably well in predicting these outcomes.

This study was relatively small and looked back at patients who had already been treated, so we can't be sure how well the test would work for new patients. The results are promising but need to be confirmed in larger studies before doctors could use this test to guide treatment decisions. If future research confirms these findings, such a test might help doctors identify which patients need extra monitoring or preventive treatments.

What this means for you:
Early research shows a blood test may help predict severe immune side effects in lymphoma patients, but more studies are needed.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed treatment for relapsed /refractory(r/r) lymphoid malignancies. Yet, these cellular immunotherapies are often associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), that pose significant risks to patient safety and limit broader clinical implementation of CAR T-cell therapies. In the current study, we used proteomics technology to establish circulating protein signatures that would predict severe CRS and ICANS in r/r lymphoma patients that subsequently received CAR T-cell therapy. Initial discovery was performed using plasma samples collected preceding CAR T-cell infusion from 39 r/r lymphoma patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center. A 5-marker and 8-marker protein panel was developed for predicting Grade [≥] 2 CRS and ICANS respectively, yielding respective AUCs of 0.85 [95% CI: 0.72-0.98] and 0.91 [95% CI: 0.81-1.00]. Independent testing of the CRS and ICANS panel was performed in a cohort of 59 r/r lymphoma patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center, with resultant AUCs of 0.76 [95% CI: 0.63-0.89] and 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51-0.84] for the CRS and ICANS panel, respectively. Patients were further classified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on panel score tertiles. In the combined dataset (MDACC + Moffitt), compared to patients in the low-risk group (reference), patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups were 3.15 [95% CI: 0.92-12.71] and 13.84 [95% CI: 4.21-56.26] more likely to have Grade [≥] 2 CRS, and 1.21 [95% CI: 0.36-4.23] and 8.59 [95% CI: 2.87-29.09] more likely to have Grade [≥]2 ICANS. The protein biomarker panels provide a means to risk stratify patients who are at high risk for developing severe CRS and ICANS, to inform on the need for prophylactic interventions and improve patient outcomes.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.