This cohort study involved 98 relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients from MD Anderson Cancer Center and Moffitt Cancer Center, divided into discovery (n=39) and independent testing (n=59) cohorts. The intervention was a circulating protein signature (5-marker and 8-marker panels) to predict severe immune-related adverse events, compared to a low-risk group as reference. The primary outcome was prediction of Grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS).
Main results showed the signature predicted Grade ≥2 CRS with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72-0.98) in the discovery cohort and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63-0.89) in independent testing. For Grade ≥2 ICANS, AUCs were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.51-0.84), respectively. In risk stratification, the high-risk group had increased odds of Grade ≥2 CRS (OR 13.84, 95% CI: 4.21-56.26) and ICANS (OR 8.59, 95% CI: 2.87-29.09) versus the low-risk group.
Safety focused on the adverse events predicted: CRS and ICANS, with serious adverse events defined as Grade ≥2. Limitations include the observational design, which precludes causal inferences, and lack of reported follow-up, discontinuations, or tolerability data. Practice relevance is that protein biomarker panels may help risk-stratify patients for severe CRS and ICANS to guide prophylactic interventions, but this is preliminary and needs further validation.
View Original Abstract ↓
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed treatment for relapsed /refractory(r/r) lymphoid malignancies. Yet, these cellular immunotherapies are often associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), that pose significant risks to patient safety and limit broader clinical implementation of CAR T-cell therapies. In the current study, we used proteomics technology to establish circulating protein signatures that would predict severe CRS and ICANS in r/r lymphoma patients that subsequently received CAR T-cell therapy. Initial discovery was performed using plasma samples collected preceding CAR T-cell infusion from 39 r/r lymphoma patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center. A 5-marker and 8-marker protein panel was developed for predicting Grade [≥] 2 CRS and ICANS respectively, yielding respective AUCs of 0.85 [95% CI: 0.72-0.98] and 0.91 [95% CI: 0.81-1.00]. Independent testing of the CRS and ICANS panel was performed in a cohort of 59 r/r lymphoma patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center, with resultant AUCs of 0.76 [95% CI: 0.63-0.89] and 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51-0.84] for the CRS and ICANS panel, respectively. Patients were further classified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on panel score tertiles. In the combined dataset (MDACC + Moffitt), compared to patients in the low-risk group (reference), patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups were 3.15 [95% CI: 0.92-12.71] and 13.84 [95% CI: 4.21-56.26] more likely to have Grade [≥] 2 CRS, and 1.21 [95% CI: 0.36-4.23] and 8.59 [95% CI: 2.87-29.09] more likely to have Grade [≥]2 ICANS. The protein biomarker panels provide a means to risk stratify patients who are at high risk for developing severe CRS and ICANS, to inform on the need for prophylactic interventions and improve patient outcomes.