Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Oral paclitaxel shows similar efficacy to IV paclitaxel in phase II metastatic breast cancer trialCan an oral pill match the power of standard IV chemo for advanced breast cancer?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider oral paclitaxel as a potential alternative with different toxicity profile in metastatic breast cancer, pending phase III confirmation.

This phase II randomized controlled trial enrolled 72 patients with HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer from the USA and Czech Republic. Patients received either oral paclitaxel (DHP107) 200 mg/m² twice daily on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days or intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on the same schedule. The primary outcome was objective response rate.

The objective response rate was 25.0% (1 complete response, 11 partial responses; 90% CI 15.1-37.3) for oral paclitaxel versus 28.6% (6 partial responses; 90% CI 13.2-48.7) for IV paclitaxel. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months versus 4.7 months (p=0.8018), and median overall survival was 17.1 months versus 13.2 months (p=0.7629). The study was not powered for definitive efficacy comparisons.

Safety profiles differed between formulations. Common all-grade adverse events for oral paclitaxel included diarrhea (68.8%), nausea (64.6%), and fatigue (52.1%), while IV paclitaxel showed fatigue (47.6%), peripheral neuropathy (42.9%), and alopecia (42.9%). The authors reported DHP107 was tolerable and feasible, but serious adverse events and discontinuation rates were not reported.

Key limitations include the small sample size, phase II design, and lack of reported follow-up duration. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported. This study provides preliminary evidence that oral paclitaxel may offer similar efficacy to IV paclitaxel with a different toxicity profile, but larger phase III trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Many women with advanced breast cancer dread the needles and clinic visits required for standard chemotherapy. Could a simple pill work just as well? A study looked at this hope for patients with HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Seventy-two adults in the US and Czech Republic took either an oral version of paclitaxel or the standard intravenous version. Both groups received the same drug, just in different forms, every 28 days.

The results showed that the oral pill and the IV injection were nearly equal in stopping the cancer from growing. About one-quarter of patients on the oral pill saw their tumors shrink, compared to about one-quarter on the IV treatment. The time before the cancer grew back was also similar, averaging 5.5 months for the pill and 4.7 months for the IV. Overall survival time was comparable at 17.1 months versus 13.2 months.

The real difference lay in the side effects. The oral pill caused more diarrhea and nausea but spared patients from the nerve damage and hair loss common with IV chemo. Both treatments caused fatigue. Because this was a Phase II study, it was not designed to prove one drug is definitively better than the other. It simply shows the oral option is a safe and feasible choice worth considering.

What this means for you:
Oral paclitaxel worked similarly to IV chemo with fewer nerve and hair side effects in this small study.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 72
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: DHP107 is an oral paclitaxel enabling administration of paclitaxel without Cremophor EL, a vehicle used to improve the solubility of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel. The randomized phase II OPERA study investigated the efficacy and safety of DHP107 versus IV paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS: OPERA was conducted in the USA and Czech Republic. Patients were ≥ 18 years, with measurable disease, and histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic breast cancer with any tumor hormone receptor status. Patients were randomized 2:1 to DHP107 (200 mg/m po bid with premedication if needed on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days) or IV paclitaxel (80 mg/m with standard premedication on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days). The primary objective was DHP107 efficacy; secondary objectives included DHP107 safety and tolerability. RESULTS: 72 patients were randomized, 48 to DHP107 and 24 to IV paclitaxel. There was one complete response and 11 partial responses with DHP107 (objective response rate [ORR 25.0%; 90% CI 15.1-37.3), and six partial responses with IV paclitaxel (objective response rate [ORR] 28.6%; 90% CI 13.2-48.7; p = 0.7559). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months for DHP107 and 4.7 months for IV paclitaxel (p = 0.8018); median overall survival (OS) was 17.1 and 13.2 months, respectively (p = 0.7629). Common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (68.8%), nausea (64.6%), and fatigue (52.1%) for DHP107 and fatigue (47.6%), peripheral neuropathy (42.9%), and alopecia (42.9%) for IV paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: DHP107 is a tolerable and feasible treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer, with similar efficacy and safety to IV paclitaxel. CLINICALTRIALS: gov no: NCT03326102; date of registration October 19, 2017.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.