Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Photodynamic therapy provides superior visual gains and faster fluid resolution in acute central serous chorioretinopathyPhotodynamic therapy shows better results for central serous chorioretinopathy

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider photodynamic therapy for durable anatomical and functional improvements in acute central serous chorioretinopathy.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in 464 eyes with acute central serous chorioretinopathy. The analysis focused on best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, and fluid resolution at 1, 3, and 12 months.

Key findings indicate that PDT results in significant gains in best-corrected visual acuity compared to observation. Furthermore, PDT-treated eyes were nearly 4 times more likely to achieve complete fluid resolution at 1 month. In contrast, anti-VEGF therapy provided only transient anatomical reduction and did not result in significant visual improvement. PDT was associated with sustained reductions in central macular thickness at 1, 3, and 12 months.

Both interventions were reported as well tolerated. While anti-VEGF therapy shows some anatomical effect, the results are transient and lack the functional benefits observed with PDT. These findings suggest that PDT may be a more effective intervention for achieving durable anatomical and functional improvements in patients with acute central serous chorioretinopathy.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in treatment selection for acute central serous chorioretinopathy. It builds upon prior evidence showing that systemic C-reactive protein levels are not significantly associated with central serous chorioretinopathy and that seasonal variations impact incidence. While previous data established the clinical profile and risk factors of the condition, this study specifically compares the durability of photodynamic therapy versus anti-VEGF agents, showing that anti-VEGF provides only transient anatomical reduction.

Living with central serous chorioretinopathy can be frustrating because fluid builds up under the retina, affecting your vision. New data comparing two common treatments shows that photodynamic therapy (PDT) offers more lasting benefits for patients who have had the condition for less than six months.

In a study of 464 eyes, researchers found that patients who received PDT saw significant improvements in their vision compared to those who were just observed. More importantly, PDT was much more effective at clearing the fluid. Patients treated with PDT were nearly four times more likely to have all fluid clear within one month compared to those who received no active treatment.

While anti-VEGF medications were also well tolerated by patients, they only provided a temporary reduction in tissue thickness. These drugs did not lead to significant improvements in vision. For patients looking for lasting anatomical changes and better sight, the evidence suggests that photodynamic therapy is the more effective path.

What this means for you:
Photodynamic therapy provides better vision and faster fluid clearance than anti-VEGF treatments for this condition.

Common questions

How does photodynamic therapy compare to anti-VEGF drugs?

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) provides significant gains in vision and sustained reductions in tissue thickness. In contrast, anti-VEGF drugs only provided a temporary, transient reduction in tissue thickness and did not lead to significant improvements in vision for the patients involved.

How quickly does photodynamic therapy clear fluid?

Photodynamic therapy is very effective at clearing fluid quickly. Patients treated with this method were nearly four times more likely to have complete fluid resolution at the one-month mark compared to those who were only observed.

Is photodynamic therapy safe for patients with this condition?

Both photodynamic therapy and anti-VEGF medications were well tolerated by the patients in the study. No specific adverse events or serious safety issues were reported for either treatment during the follow-up period.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) may resolve spontaneously, but risks progression to chronic disease with visual impairment. We performed a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis evaluating photodynamic therapy (PDT) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents versus observation in acute CSC (<6 months), searching PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (October 2014 - May 2025) for comparative studies. Eleven studies (5 randomized, 6 non-randomized; 464 eyes) were included. PDT demonstrated robust superiority over observation, achieving significant best-corrected visual acuity gains and sustained central macular thickness reductions at 1, 3, and 12 months. Notably, PDT-treated eyes were nearly 4 times more likely to achieve complete fluid resolution at 1 month, a benefit maintained across all follow-up intervals. Conversely, anti-VEGF therapy provided only a transient anatomical reduction at 1 month, without significant visual improvement or sustained benefit. Both interventions were well tolerated. In conclusion, half-dose PDT provides durable anatomical and functional improvements for acute CSC, significantly accelerating fluid resolution and visual recovery. While observation remains a valid initial approach, early PDT is practically advantageous for patients requiring rapid visual rehabilitation or to mitigate permanent photoreceptor damage from persistent fluid. Anti-VEGF therapy offers limited, transient anatomical effects without functional benefit and should be reserved for atypical cases or when PDT is unavailable.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.