Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Genetic testing completion rates and diagnostic yield vary by race in hereditary eye disorders patientsGenetic Testing Gaps Leave Many With Eye Disorders Undiagnosed

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note racial disparities in genetic testing completion and diagnostic yield among patients with hereditary eye disorders.

This retrospective cohort study evaluated 1466 patients with clinically diagnosed hereditary eye disorders at the Wilmer Eye Institute's Genetic Eye Disease Center. The primary outcomes included the proportion of patients completing genetic testing, molecular diagnostic yield, and clinical predictors. The median follow-up duration was 6 years. Safety data, including adverse events and tolerability, were not reported.

Among the 1466 patients, 1088 completed genetic testing, representing 74% completion. Molecular diagnostic yield was 62%, with 118 causative genes identified. ABCA4, USH2A, PRPH2, RHO, and BEST1 accounted for 47% of cases. Results were inconclusive in 22% of cases, and no diagnosis was reached in 16%.

Odds ratios for GT completion were 0.40 for Black participants and 0.57 for Other race participants, with 95% CIs of 0.30-0.53 and 0.36-0.92 respectively. For molecular diagnosis, odds ratios were 0.37 for Black participants and 0.58 for Other race participants, with 95% CIs of 0.26-0.51 and 0.35-0.98 respectively. These findings indicate lower odds for Black and Other race participants in both outcomes.

The study underscores the need to expand early access to genetic testing, diversify genomic databases, and address systemic barriers. This is essential to ensure equity in hereditary eye disorder diagnosis, clinical trial access, and delivery of emerging therapies. Limitations regarding funding or conflicts of interest were not reported.

Genetic Testing Gaps Leave Many With Eye Disorders Undiagnosed

A Simple Switch That Changes Everything

Imagine you have a key that opens a specific lock. Now imagine you are handed a box of keys, but the lock you need is never given to you. This is the reality for many people with hereditary eye disorders. They visit specialists, describe their vision problems, and wait for answers. But the system often fails them before the test even begins.

This situation affects thousands of Americans. Hereditary eye diseases are not rare. They run in families and cause vision loss that can be prevented or treated if found early. Yet, many patients walk away without a genetic diagnosis. Without that diagnosis, they cannot access new therapies or join clinical trials. They are left in the dark.

Doctors have long known that some groups face hurdles in healthcare. But this new study from the Wilmer Eye Institute offers hard numbers. It looked at over 1,400 patients between 2002 and 2025. The team wanted to know why some people got tested while others did not.

The results were clear. Younger patients were more likely to get tested. People whose symptoms started earlier also had better chances. But race played a huge role. Black patients and patients of other races had significantly lower odds of completing genetic testing. The odds were less than half of what White patients experienced.

This is not just about waiting longer in a clinic. The study found that these disparities happened even when patients arrived at the same time. This suggests the problem lies in the system itself, not in how quickly a patient seeks help.

The Biology Behind The Vision Loss

To understand the stakes, we must look at the genes involved. Think of your DNA as a factory blueprint. Some genes tell your eyes how to build light-sensing cells. When a gene is broken, the factory stops working properly.

Researchers found that five specific genes caused nearly half of the diagnosed cases. These include ABCA4, USH2A, PRPH2, RHO, and BEST1. Knowing which gene is broken is like finding the broken machine in the factory. It tells doctors exactly what is wrong.

But here is the twist. Many patients never get the chance to find out which gene is broken. If a patient does not get tested, the broken machine remains hidden. Without knowing the specific gene, doctors cannot match the patient to the right treatment. New drugs are being developed for specific genes. If you do not know your gene, you cannot get the medicine that works for you.

The researchers analyzed a massive group of patients. They looked at age, race, sex, and how long they had been followed. They also checked how well the patients could see.

The findings were stark. Black patients had much lower odds of getting a molecular diagnosis. The odds were 0.37 compared to White patients. Patients of other races also faced similar hurdles. Their odds were 0.58. This means they were less than half as likely to get a clear answer.

Visual outcomes were also worse for these groups. Patients had poorer vision at the start and did not improve as much over time. This happens because they often miss the window for early treatment. Without a diagnosis, they cannot get the care that could save their sight.

This doesn't mean this treatment is available yet.

The study also noted that male patients and those with syndromic forms of the disease were more likely to get a diagnosis. This points to other biases in how doctors prioritize testing. Not every patient gets the same level of attention or urgency.

If you or a loved one has an eye condition, this news is important. It highlights a need for change. We need to make sure everyone has equal access to genetic testing. We need to fix the barriers that stop minority patients from getting answers.

You should talk to your doctor about genetic testing if you have a family history of eye disease. Ask if you qualify for new therapies based on your specific gene. Be aware that delays can happen, and you may need to advocate for yourself.

The goal is to ensure that every patient gets the same chance at a diagnosis. This means expanding access to testing centers and diversifying the databases used to interpret results. We need a system where race does not predict your outcome.

This study is the largest of its kind in the United States. It gives us a clear map of where the gaps are. Now we must act on that map. Researchers are calling for more diverse genomic databases. They want to include more people from all backgrounds.

Clinical trials need to be more inclusive. If trials only include White patients, new drugs will not work for everyone. We must build a healthcare system that serves all families. It will take time to fix these deep-rooted issues. But the path forward is clear. We must prioritize equity in eye care.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
Sample sizen = 1,466
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Objective: To identify clinical and demographic predictors of genetic testing (GT) completion and diagnostic yield among patients with genetic eye disorders (GED) at a large U.S. tertiary academic center. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: Patients with clinically diagnosed GEDs evaluated at the Wilmer Eye Institute's Genetic Eye Disease (GEDi) Center between 2002 and 2025. Methods: Demographic, clinical, and GT data were extracted. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with GT completion and molecular diagnosis. Subgroup analyses examined racial disparities between Black, non-Hispanic White, and Other race participants. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of patients completing GT, molecular diagnostic yield, and clinical/demographic predictors of each. Results: Of 1466 participants (median age at presentation 44 years, symptom onset 28 years; median follow-up 6 years), 74% (1088) completed genetic testing, with a likely molecular diagnosis achieved in 62%, inconclusive results in 22%, and no diagnosis in 16%. GT completion was more likely among younger participants with earlier symptom onset, and longer follow-up. Likely molecular diagnosis was more likely in participants with earlier symptom onset, worse visual acuity (VA), male sex, and syndromic or X-linked phenotypes. Black and Other race participants had significantly lower odds of completing GT (Black: OR [95% CI] 0.40 [0.30-0.53]; Other: 0.57 [0.36-0.92]) and receiving a likely molecular diagnosis (Black: 0.37 [0.26-0.51]; Other: 0.58 [0.35-0.98]), and consistently exhibited worse VA at both baseline and follow-up. Notably, among Black and Other race participants, disparities in GT completion and visual outcomes persisted despite equivalent or shorter time from presentation to GT completion, suggesting barriers arise independently of delays in care engagement. We identified 118 causative genes among participants with likely molecular diagnoses, with ABCA4, USH2A, PRPH2, RHO, and BEST1 accounting for 47% of cases. Conclusions: This is the largest single-center GED genetic testing cohort reported in the U.S. and reveals significant disparities in GT completion and yield by race, age, sex, and disease-level factors. Our findings underscore the need to expand early access to GT, diversify genomic databases, and address systemic barriers to ensure equity in GED diagnosis, clinical trial access, and delivery of emerging therapies.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.