Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Narrative review of injectable corneal endothelial cell therapy for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy

Narrative review of injectable corneal endothelial cell therapy for Fuchs endothelial corneal…
Photo by Vivien Gelu / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that injectable CEC therapy has limited efficacy due to poor cell adhesion and survival in current pre-clinical and clinical data.

This narrative review covers pre-clinical and clinical evidence regarding injectable corneal endothelial cell (CEC) therapy for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. The scope includes secondary outcomes such as corneal transparency, cell adhesion, cell survival, safety, and efficacy. Follow-up periods in the reviewed literature extend up to 5 years.

The authors synthesize findings indicating that simple cultured CEC injections demonstrated poor efficacy. This limitation is attributed to issues with limited cell adhesion and survival. The review does not report specific adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability data.

Key limitations identified by the authors include persisting challenges with phenotypic stability, as well as long-term safety and efficacy. The review highlights that human studies are still ongoing and further work is required to optimize cell preparation, delivery, and long-term safety. Injectable CEC therapy is presented as a promising minimally invasive alternative to corneal transplantation, though practice relevance remains cautious given the current evidence gaps.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionCorneal endothelial dysfunction, most commonly caused by Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK), leads to stromal edema and corneal decompensation when endothelial cell density (ECD) falls below 500–700cells/mm². Standard treatment via corneal transplantation, including Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), is limited by the need to standardize corneal endothelial cell culture, donor shortages, immune rejection, and technical complications.This review aims to summarize recent advances in injectable corneal endothelial cell (CEC) therapy, critically appraise translational challenges, and discuss future directions for establishing this regenerative approach as a global treatment.DesignNarrative review of pre-clinical and clinical studies examining CEC injection therapy.MethodsRelevant literature was analyzed to evaluate innovations in Human corneal endothelial cells (HCEC) preparation, culture techniques, delivery methods, and strategies to enhance cell adhesion and survival. Studies reporting preclinical models and human clinical trials were included to assess safety, efficacy, and translational feasibility.ResultsCorneal endothelial cells (CEC) injections have achieved significant advancement since their development. Simple cultured CEC injections showed poor efficacy due to limited cell adhesion and survival, but the introduction of ROCK inhibitors along with cultured CECs demonstrated improvement in corneal transparency up to 5 years. Advancements in cell delivery techniques like hydrogel, carrier-assisted injections, magnetically guided injections, as well as alternative cell sources have shown promising results in pre-clinical studies, but human studies are still ongoing. Despite advancements, persisting challenges include phenotypic stability, and longterm safety and efficacy.DiscussionInjectable CEC therapy is a promising minimally invasive alternative to corneal transplantation. While early clinical outcomes are encouraging, further work is required to optimize cell preparation, delivery, and long-term safety, and to establish the therapy as a scalable, globally applicable treatment for endothelial failure.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.