Living with a chronic, unstable ankle can make everyday activities and sports feel like a constant challenge. For many people, the decision of how to surgically repair this instability comes down to two main methods: an open procedure or a less invasive arthroscopic approach (using a small camera).
A large review of 875 patients compared these two surgical techniques. While both methods were effective at stabilizing the ankle and showed similar surgery times, the arthroscopic group reported lower pain scores and reached milestones for returning to sports faster than those who had the open procedure.
It is important to note that while the data suggests some benefits for the arthroscopic method regarding pain and recovery speed, the researchers noted that the certainty of these specific findings is limited. Because both methods are effective at stabilizing the joint, your doctor can help determine which path best fits your personal goals.
Common questions
Is arthroscopic surgery better than open surgery for my ankle?
Both the open and arthroscopic Broström-Gould procedures are effective for treating chronic lateral ankle instability. While both methods showed similar results for surgery time and overall stability, the arthroscopy group reported significantly lower pain scores (VAS) and a faster return to sports.
How much faster can I return to sports with arthroscopic surgery?
Patients who underwent the arthroscopic procedure showed statistically significant improvements in time to return to sports compared to those who had open surgery. However, researchers noted that the certainty of this specific finding is limited.
Are there different risks between these two surgical methods?
The study found no statistically significant difference in total complication rates between the arthroscopic and open procedures. Both techniques were shown to be broadly comparable in terms of overall outcomes for patients with chronic lateral ankle instability.