Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Arthroscopic Broström-Gould procedure shows significantly better K-P scores and lower VAS scoresArthroscopic surgery may reduce pain and speed sports return

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that while both procedures are comparable, arthroscopy shows statistically significant improvements in K-P and VAS scores.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy and postoperative recovery rates for patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) undergoing either an arthroscopic or open Broström-Gould procedure. The analysis included 875 patients across multiple studies to compare surgical techniques.

The meta-analysis found no statistically significant differences between the two procedures regarding surgery time (MD = -5.33, p = 0.21), AOFAS scores (MD = 0.36, p = 0.23), Tegner activity scores (MD = 0.13, p = 0.27), anterior drawer tests (MD = -0.10, p = 0.14), talar tilt (MD = -0.00, p = 0.99), or total complication rates (OR = 0.88, p = 0.59).

Statistically significant improvements were noted in the arthroscopy group for K-P scores (MD = 0.78, p = 0.04) and VAS scores (MD = -0.65, p = 0.02). Additionally, patients in the arthroscopy group reported a significantly faster time to return to sports (MD = -3.91, p = 0.03).

The authors note that while some outcomes favored arthroscopy, the certainty of findings regarding earlier return to sport or reduced pain is limited. Clinically, both techniques provide comparable overall results for CLAI, though arthroscopy may offer specific benefits in pain scores and recovery speed.

Living with a chronic, unstable ankle can make everyday activities and sports feel like a constant challenge. For many people, the decision of how to surgically repair this instability comes down to two main methods: an open procedure or a less invasive arthroscopic approach (using a small camera).

A large review of 875 patients compared these two surgical techniques. While both methods were effective at stabilizing the ankle and showed similar surgery times, the arthroscopic group reported lower pain scores and reached milestones for returning to sports faster than those who had the open procedure.

It is important to note that while the data suggests some benefits for the arthroscopic method regarding pain and recovery speed, the researchers noted that the certainty of these specific findings is limited. Because both methods are effective at stabilizing the joint, your doctor can help determine which path best fits your personal goals.

What this means for you:
Arthroscopic surgery may offer less pain and a faster return to sports for chronic ankle instability.

Common questions

Is arthroscopic surgery better than open surgery for my ankle?

Both the open and arthroscopic Broström-Gould procedures are effective for treating chronic lateral ankle instability. While both methods showed similar results for surgery time and overall stability, the arthroscopy group reported significantly lower pain scores (VAS) and a faster return to sports.

How much faster can I return to sports with arthroscopic surgery?

Patients who underwent the arthroscopic procedure showed statistically significant improvements in time to return to sports compared to those who had open surgery. However, researchers noted that the certainty of this specific finding is limited.

Are there different risks between these two surgical methods?

The study found no statistically significant difference in total complication rates between the arthroscopic and open procedures. Both techniques were shown to be broadly comparable in terms of overall outcomes for patients with chronic lateral ankle instability.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundChronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) is a common complication of ankle sprains, and the Broström-Gould procedure is the preferred option. This study aimed to compare the short-term (with a mean follow-up period of 24 months) clinical efficacy and postoperative recovery rate between arthroscopic and open Broström-Gould surgery in patients with CLAI.MethodsThe present study followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science were searched to 31 December 2025.Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (version5.3) for the following outcomes: surgery time, AOFAS scores, K-P scores, VAS scores, Tegner activity scores, Anterior drawer, Talar tilt, Return to sports, Total complication rates, Bias risk evaluation was performed applying the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).Results14 studies (875 patients) met criteria, with 421 allocated to open and 454 to arthroscopic groups.There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time [mean difference [MD] = −5.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], −13.68 to 3.01; p = 0.21], AOFAS scores (MD = 0.36; 95% CI, −0.23 to 0.96; p = 0.23), Tegner activity scores (MD = 0.13; 95% CI, −0.10 to 0.36; p = 0.27), anterior drawer test (MD = −0.10; 95% CI, −0.23 to 0.03; p = 0.14), talar tilt (MD = −0.00; 95% CI, −0.51 to 0.51; p = 0.99) and all complication rates [odds ratio (OR) = 0.88; 95%CI, 0.55 to 1.41; p = 0.59]. The arthroscopy group achieved significantly better results in terms of K-P scores (MD = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.54, p = 0.04), VAS scores (MD = −0.65; 95% CI, −1.17 to −0.12, p = 0.02), and time to return to sports (MD = −3.91; 95% CI, −7.52 to −0.30; p = 0.03).ConclusionsBoth techniques show broadly comparable outcomes, with possible earlier return to sport or less pain after arthroscopy, although the certainty of this finding is limited.Level of EvidenceLevel III, systematic review.This protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO database CRD420261298649.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.