Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Conversion hip arthroplasty after failed intertrochanteric fracture fixation shows 17% complication rateStudy reviews complication rates for hip replacement after failed hip fracture repair

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider conversion hip arthroplasty as a salvage option with a 17% complication risk after failed fixation.

This meta-analysis pooled data from 25 studies involving 1,468 hips to evaluate clinical outcomes of conversion hip arthroplasty (CHA) after failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. The analysis included patients with a mean follow-up of 51.08 months, though specific study settings and comparator groups were not reported. The intervention was CHA as a salvage procedure following fixation failure.

The main results showed an overall complication rate of 17%. Specific complications included periprosthetic fractures (9%), dislocations (5%), loosening (3%), and infection (3%). Functional outcome, measured by the Harris Hip Score, showed a mean of 84.19. Procedural metrics included a mean operation time of 150.24 minutes and mean perioperative blood loss of 918.39 mL. No effect sizes, absolute numbers, or statistical confidence intervals were reported for these outcomes.

Safety data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported in the analysis. Key limitations include the observational nature of the included studies, lack of comparator data, and absence of statistical measures for the reported rates. The practice relevance statement from the source suggests CHA yields favorable functional recovery and represents an effective salvage strategy, but clinicians should interpret these aggregate rates with caution due to the evidence limitations.

This research combined data from 25 previous studies to understand what happens when patients need a hip replacement after their initial surgery to fix a broken hip fails. The studies included information on 1,468 hip surgeries. The patients had all undergone a procedure called conversion hip arthroplasty, which is a salvage operation after the first repair didn't work.

The review found that, on average, about 17 out of every 100 patients experienced a complication. The most frequent problem was a fracture around the new hip implant, occurring in about 9% of cases. Other complications included dislocation (5%), infection (3%), and loosening of the implant (3%). On a positive note, patients' hip function, measured by a standard score, improved to a good level on average after the surgery.

It's important to know this is a meta-analysis, meaning it pools results from many different studies that were done in the past. The studies varied in how they were conducted, and the review did not compare this surgery to other possible treatments. The results give doctors a broad picture of potential risks and functional improvements, but they cannot tell any single patient exactly what to expect from this complex procedure.

What this means for you:
Hip replacement after failed fracture repair has known risks; discuss specific benefits and complications with your surgeon.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up51.1 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Although internal fixation (IF) techniques for intertrochanteric fractures have continuously advanced, the failure rate remains around 5%, often requiring secondary surgical intervention. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of conversion hip arthroplasty (CHA) following IF failure in intertrochanteric fracture patients. METHODS: A total of 1,468 hips with CHA for failed IF of intertrochanteric fracture from 25 studies were included. The primary outcome was complication rate, including loosening, infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fractures. The secondary outcomes were functional outcome measured by Harris Hip Score (HHS), operation time, and perioperative blood loss. A proportion meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to estimate the complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period of the included studies was 51.08 months. The overall complication rate was 17%. Among specific complications, the loosening and infection rates were both 3%, while the dislocation rate was 5%. The pooled incidence of periprosthetic fractures including intraoperative and postoperative fractures was 9%. The mean HHS was 84.19. The mean operation time was 150.24 minutes, and the mean perioperative blood loss was 918.39 mL. CONCLUSIONS: CHA demonstrates an overall complication rate of 17%, which is slightly higher than that of primary hip arthroplasty, mainly reflecting the elevated risks of periprosthetic fractures and dislocation. Despite these concerns, CHA yields favorable functional recovery and represents an effective salvage strategy following failed IF, thereby supporting its continued role in clinical practice.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.