Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Consensus identifies force plate tests for military physical readiness screeningExperts agree on force plate tests to screen military readiness

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider using multi-joint isometrics, CMJ, and drop jump for military physical screening, but metric selection lacks consensus.

This publication is a consensus-based guideline derived from a structured online survey of 10 experts in military training and physical performance. Its scope is to establish which force plate tests and metrics are most suitable for screening physical performance characteristics prior to military training, with the goal of informing physical readiness assessments, musculoskeletal injury risk prediction, and course pass likelihood.

The expert panel reached strong consensus on three specific tests: multi-joint isometrics, countermovement jump (CMJ), and drop jump. These were selected based on criteria including biomechanical relevance, redundancy, reliability, test duration, interpretability, and feasibility. However, no initial consensus was achieved on which specific metrics derived from these tests should be used, indicating a gap in standardization.

The authors note a key limitation: the small sample size of 10 responders, which limits the generalizability of the consensus. Additionally, as a consensus study, it reflects expert opinion rather than empirical validation, and the findings should be considered preliminary.

For clinicians and military training staff, these results offer a starting point for selecting force plate tests to complement physical preparation strategies. However, the lack of consensus on metrics and the small expert panel mean that further research is needed to validate these tests and metrics against actual injury and performance outcomes.

Preparing for the physical demands of military training is a high-stakes task. Even a small injury can sideline a service member before they ever reach the field. To address this, experts looked for reliable ways to screen physical performance and identify potential injury risks before training begins.

The experts reached a strong consensus on three specific tests: multi-joint isometrics, countermovement jumps, and drop jumps. These tests are designed to measure how the body handles force and movement. While the experts agreed on which tests to use, they did not reach a consensus on which specific metrics to use to measure those results.

Because this was a consensus study based on a small group of ten experts, the findings are not a substitute for clinical trials. However, these specific tests provide a clear starting point for creating better physical preparation strategies for military personnel.

What this means for you:
Experts agree that multi-joint isometrics and specific jump tests can help screen military readiness.

Common questions

What specific tests were chosen to screen for readiness?

Experts reached a strong consensus on three specific tests: multi-joint isometrics, countermovement jump (CMJ), and drop jump. These tests are intended to help assess physical readiness and the risk of musculoskeletal injury before military training begins.

How do these tests help military personnel?

These force plate tests help identify physical performance characteristics. They are intended to complement preparation strategies by highlighting injury risks and the likelihood of a person passing a training course.

Were there any specific measurements agreed upon for these tests?

While there was a strong consensus on which tests to use, there was no initial consensus on the specific metrics used to measure the results of those tests.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The aim of this study was to seek opinion (via an online survey) and gain consensus of which force plate tests and metrics may be considered by military operating/training staff to better screen physical performance characteristics prior to military personnel attending a physically arduous military training course. Ten responders with known experience and/or expertise in using force plate technology for the measurement of force production characteristics completed the survey. Responders were asked to select the most important force plate test and metrics to complement a pre-course physical performance battery to assess physical readiness, musculoskeletal injury risk and likelihood of passing the course. Types of force plate tests included bodyweight tests, single joint and multi-joint isometric tests, countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump, rebound jump tests and drop landings. For each “type” of test recommended, a drop-down list of metrics was provided for responders to select. These metrics were categorized as “outcome-based”, “force-based”, “power-based”, “rate of force development-based”, “impulse-based”, “velocity-based”, and “time-based” metrics. If answered “yes”, a comprehensive and standardized list of force plate derived metrics would appear. Responders were asked to select metrics from this list that they considered important to report. Initially, there was a strong consensus on “test” selection (multi-joint isometrics test, CMJ, and drop jump), but not “metric” selection. Responder metrics were evaluated for biomechanical relevance, redundancy, reliability, test duration, interpretability and feasibility before consensus was reached for minimum force plate tests and metric dataset to complement physical readiness strategies prior to commencing strenuous military training courses.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.