Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Surgical management of neglected Lisfranc injuries significantly improves AOFAS scores regardless of surgical delaySurgery Improves Function for Patients with Neglected Lisfranc Injuries

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that surgical management improves AOFAS scores in neglected Lisfranc injuries regardless of the delay.

This meta-analysis evaluated the outcomes of surgical management in 262 patients with neglected Lisfranc injuries. The primary finding was that surgical intervention was associated with a significant improvement in AOFAS scores. Analysis of injury energy revealed that patients with high-energy injuries had lower preoperative scores but demonstrated greater absolute postoperative improvement, resulting in postoperative scores comparable to those with lower-energy injuries.

Regarding the impact of timing and technique, the authors found that neither the specific surgical procedure nor the duration of the delay were associated with functional improvement. However, complication rates were reported at 34%, with higher rates observed specifically in high-energy injuries and cases involving longer delays.

Clinical implications suggest that surgical decision-making should prioritize joint viability and reducibility over the duration of the delay. It is important to note that functional recovery may reflect the initial severity of the injury rather than the timing of the intervention alone. The study notes that the association between surgery and AOFAS scores was established, while meta-regression was used to evaluate other factors.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses the management of neglected Lisfranc injuries. It extends the clinical understanding of surgical outcomes by demonstrating that surgical intervention improves AOFAS scores regardless of the delay. This finding complements the prior coverage regarding medial TMT injuries, where anatomical reduction is crucial to reduce the 33% post-traumatic osteoarthritis rate.

This review looked at 262 patients who had neglected Lisfranc injuries, which are specific types of foot fractures. The study focused on how surgical management affected the patients' ability to use their feet and move comfortably, measured by standard clinical scores.

Researchers found that surgery was associated with a significant improvement in these functional scores. Interestingly, patients with high-energy injuries started with lower scores but showed greater overall improvement after surgery. Their final scores were similar to those of patients with lower-energy injuries. The specific type of surgery performed and the amount of time that passed before surgery did not change the final functional outcome.

There were some risks involved, with a 34% complication rate reported. Higher complication rates were seen in cases involving high-energy injuries and longer delays in treatment. Because the final results often depend on the initial severity of the injury, patients should talk to their doctors about joint health and the timing of surgery to make the best plan for their recovery.

What this means for you:
Surgery improves function for neglected Lisfranc injuries, though higher-energy injuries may have more complications.

Common questions

Does surgery help people with severe Lisfranc injuries?

Yes, the study found that surgery was associated with a significant improvement in functional scores for patients with neglected Lisfranc injuries. Even patients with high-energy injuries, who started with lower scores, showed significant improvement after surgery and ended with results similar to those with lower-energy injuries.

What are the risks of surgery for this type of injury?

The study reported a 34% complication rate for surgical management. These complications were more common in cases involving high-energy injuries and longer delays in treatment. You should discuss these risks and your specific injury with your doctor.

Does the timing of the surgery affect the final outcome?

The study found that the specific surgical procedure used and the amount of time that passed before surgery were not associated with the final functional improvement. However, longer delays were linked to higher complication rates in some cases.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Lisfranc injuries are frequently overlooked or underestimated. Treatment of neglected injuries is challenging, and the optimal surgical strategy in delayed presentations remains unclear. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Observational studies reporting surgical outcomes of corrective surgery for neglected Lisfranc injuries were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for AOFAS scores, complication rates, and return-to-work proportions. Meta-regression evaluated the influence of injury energy, surgical procedure, and treatment delay. RESULTS: Ten studies with 262 cases were included. Surgery was associated with a significant improvement in AOFAS scores. Patients with high-energy injuries demonstrated lower preoperative scores but greater absolute postoperative improvement, while postoperative scores remained comparable. The choice of surgical procedure and delay were not associated with functional improvement. The pooled complication rate was 34%, with higher rates observed in high-energy injuries and with longer delays. CONCLUSIONS: In neglected Lisfranc injuries, functional recovery reflects baseline severity rather than timing alone. Surgical decision-making should prioritize joint viability and reducibility over delay.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.