Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Patellar tendon autografts provide superior rotational stability compared to hamstring tendon autografts in ACL reconstructionPatellar tendon grafts provide better stability after ACL surgery

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that PT autografts offer superior rotational stability while HT autografts significantly reduce anterior knee pain.

This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluated outcomes for patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using either patellar tendon (PT) or hamstring tendon (HT) autografts. The analysis included 713 patients to compare graft failure, rotational stability, and post-operative pain.

Key findings indicate that PT autografts are associated with statistically superior objective rotational stability (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.95, p < 0.001). Conversely, HT autografts were associated with a 63% relative reduction in post-operative anterior knee pain (RR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.49, p < 0.001). While there was a trend toward lower structural graft failure with PT autografts (RR = 1.55; 95% CI: 0.82 to 2.93), this result was not statistically significant (p = 0.174).

Clinically, the choice of graft involves a trade-off between mechanical stability and donor-site morbidity. PT autografts provide superior rotational stability, whereas HT autografts significantly reduce anterior knee pain. The results suggest that surgeons may weigh the need for rotational stability against the risk of anterior knee pain when selecting the appropriate autograft for ACL reconstruction.

When a person tears their anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), surgery is often the path to getting back on their feet. However, surgeons must decide which piece of tissue to use as a replacement. This choice between a patellar tendon and a hamstring tendon can change how the knee feels and functions after the operation.

Data from 713 patients shows that using a patellar tendon provides better objective rotational stability for the knee. This means the joint stays more stable during movement. On the other hand, patients who received a hamstring tendon graft experienced a 63% reduction in front of the knee pain. This suggests that while the patellar option offers more stability, the hamstring option may be more comfortable for the patient's daily life.

While there was a trend toward fewer graft failures with the patellar tendon, this result was not statistically significant. Because both options have distinct trade-offs regarding stability and pain, patients should talk to their doctors to decide which graft best fits their specific goals and lifestyle.

What this means for you:
Patellar tendons offer better knee stability, while hamstring tendons significantly reduce front-of-knee pain.

Common questions

Which graft provides better stability for my knee?

The study found that patellar tendon autografts provide statistically superior objective rotational stability compared to hamstring tendon autografts. This means the knee joint remains more stable during movement when using the patellar tendon.

Which surgery option results in less pain?

Patients who received a hamstring tendon autograft saw a 63% reduction in post-operative anterior knee pain compared to those who received a patellar tendon. This makes the hamstring option a significant choice for reducing pain in the front of the knee.

Is one graft less likely to fail than the other?

There was a trend toward lower structural graft failure with patellar tendon autografts. However, this result was not statistically significant, meaning the data does not confirm one is definitely more durable than the other.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 713
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Abstract Introduction The optimal autograft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains a subject of debate in orthopedic surgery. This meta-analysis evaluates long-term structural outcomes and donor-site complications by pooling data exclusively from high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials comparing primary PT and HT autografts. Revision surgeries and allografts were excluded. The primary endpoints analyzed were graft failure, objective rotational stability, and post-operative anterior knee pain (AKP). Results Data were pooled from 5 core RCTs encompassing 713 patients. A random-effects meta-analysis showed that the trend toward lower structural graft failure with PT autografts did not reach statistical significance [RR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.82 to 2.93, $p = 0.174$]. However, PT autografts demonstrated statistically superior objective knee rotational stability [RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.95, $p < 0.001$]. Conversely, HT autografts were associated with a significant reduction in donor-site morbidity, demonstrating a 63% relative reduction in chronic post-operative anterior knee pain [RR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.49, $p < 0.001$]. Conclusions Patellar tendon autografts provide superior objective rotational stability, though the observed reduction in structural graft failure rates was not statistically significant. Hamstring tendon autografts significantly reduce post-operative donor-site morbidity and chronic kneeling pain. Graft selection should be tailored to patient-specific athletic demands and occupational requirements. Clinical consensus regarding the optimal autograft selection for primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains divided. While bone-patellar tendon-bone (PT) autografts have historically been associated with excellent mechanical stability, quadrupled hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely utilized to mitigate donor-site morbidity. However, individual randomized controlled trials often present variable data regarding the precise magnitude of differences in rotational laxity and long-term anterior knee pain. This meta-analysis pools recent high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials to provide a precise, consolidated quantitative matrix of clinical outcomes. It confirms that while the PT configuration offers statistically superior objective rotational joint stability (p < 0.001), the HT configuration yields a profound 63% relative risk reduction (p < 0.001) in chronic post-operative anterior knee pain and kneeling distress. This defines a clear trade-off matrix to guide patient-specific graft selection based on occupational and physical demands.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.