LESS vs conventional laparoscopy shows no significant differences in perioperative outcomes for benign adnexal diseases
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 8 randomized controlled trials comparing laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) to conventional laparoscopy (CL) in patients with benign adnexal diseases. The study design was a meta-analysis of RCTs, but key details such as sample size, setting, and follow-up duration were not reported. The intervention was LESS, with CL as the comparator, focusing on perioperative outcomes.
Main results showed no significant differences between LESS and CL for primary outcomes: perioperative complication rate (risk ratio 2.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 11.78, p = 0.14), postoperative pain at 6 hours (weighted mean difference -0.31, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.13, p = 0.16), 24 hours (WMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.00, p = 0.05), and 48 hours (WMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.77 to 0.30, p = 0.39). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant differences: operative time (WMD 3.68, 95% CI -0.81 to 8.17, p = 0.11), hospital stay (WMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.03, p = 0.11), estimated blood loss (WMD -7.63, 95% CI -31.83 to 16.57, p = 0.54), and hemoglobin drop (WMD 0.18, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.39, p = 0.08). Absolute numbers for these outcomes were not reported.
Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations, were not reported. Key limitations include unreported sample sizes, absolute outcome numbers, and results for cosmetic satisfaction and conversion to laparotomy, which were listed as outcomes but not detailed in the abstract. Funding and conflicts of interest were also not reported. In practice, LESS appears effective and safe for benign adnexal diseases based on equivalence to CL in perioperative outcomes, but clinicians should consider the evidence incomplete due to these gaps.