Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Suture button fixation provides superior clinical scores and lower infection rates in syndesmotic ankle fracturesSuture button fixation shows better outcomes for syndesmotic ankle fractures

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider suture button fixation as a preferred surgical option for syndesmotic ankle fractures due to better clinical scores.

This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of suture button fixation (SB) compared to syndesmotic screw fixation (SS) and tibiotalocalcaneal nail (TTC) in 1040 patients with syndesmotic ankle fractures. The primary outcome measured was the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at 1-year and 2-year follow-ups. The study also assessed secondary outcomes including infection rates and reoperation rates.

The analysis found that SB resulted in significantly higher OMAS scores compared to both SS and TTC at both the 1-year and 2-year follow-up marks. Additionally, SB was associated with significantly lower infection rates and significantly lower reoperation rates compared to SS. When comparing TTC to SS, TTC showed significantly lower infection rates and higher OMAS scores at 2-year follow-up.

While the meta-analysis suggests that SB is a superior surgical intervention for syndesmotic ankle fractures due to improved clinical outcomes and safety profiles, the level of evidence is rated as 3. Specific effect sizes and confidence intervals were not reported in the data provided. Clinical application should consider these findings as evidence of association rather than definitive proof of superiority.

When you suffer a syndesmotic ankle fracture, the goal of surgery is to stabilize the joint so you can move and heal properly. Doctors have different ways to fix these fractures, including using screws or a method called suture button fixation. This method uses a button and thread to hold the bones in place.

A large review of 1,040 patients compared these methods over a 24-month period. The results showed that suture button fixation led to significantly higher Olerud-Molander Ankle Scores, which measure how well a patient functions. It also resulted in lower infection rates and fewer needs for repeat surgeries compared to using screws.

While the study shows suture button fixation has better clinical benefits than both screws and certain nails, it is important to remember that this is a broad review of existing data. Because specific measurements for the size of the improvement were not provided, you should talk to your surgeon to see which option fits your specific injury.

What this means for you:
Suture button fixation shows better scores and lower infection rates than other methods for syndesmotic ankle fractures.

Common questions

What is suture button fixation?

Suture button fixation is a surgical method used to treat syndesmotic ankle fractures. It uses a button and thread to stabilize the bones. This study found that this method resulted in higher Olerud-Molander Ankle Scores, which measure how well a patient can use their ankle, compared to using screws or nails.

Is suture button fixation safer than using screws?

The study found that suture button fixation had a significantly lower infection rate and a significantly lower reoperation rate compared to using screws. These results suggest it may be a more reliable option for patients recovering from syndesmotic ankle fractures.

How does it compare to other treatments for ankle fractures?

The study compared suture button fixation to both screw fixation and tibiotalocalcaneal nails. Suture button fixation performed better than both methods in terms of patient scores and infection rates. You should discuss these specific surgical options with your doctor.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,040
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up24.0 mo
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundSyndesmotic ankle fractures occur when damage to the syndesmosis complex is combined with a malleolar fracture. This can result in severe pain, weakness, and instability. Surgical interventions include syndesmotic screw fixation (SS), suture button fixation (SB), and tibiotalocalcaneal nail (TTC). This meta-analysis aims to compare the outcomes of these treatment methods for syndesmotic ankle fractures.MethodsA literature search was conducted on PubMed and Embase for comparison studies that included at least 2 surgical interventions and at least one of the relevant functional outcomes and/or complication metrics until June 2024. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) was used to compare functional outcomes, and it is a self-reported outcome measure that evaluates the symptoms and function of those with ankle fractures, while infections and reoperations were reported to compare complication outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4. A P-value ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. The risk of bias was assessed with Review Manager 5.4. and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.ResultsA total of 18 studies with a total of 1,040 patients were ultimately included in this study. The SS had a significantly higher OMAS 2-year follow-up compared to TTC. The TTC had a significantly lower infection rate compared to SS. The SB had a significantly higher OMAS at both 1-year and 2-year follow-ups than SS. The SB had a significantly lower reoperation rate compared to SS. The SB had a significantly higher OMAS at both 1-year and 2-year follow-ups than TTC. The SB had a significantly lower infection rate compared to TTC.ConclusionThe SB emerges as the preferred treatment method for syndesmotic ankle fractures, while TTC stands as a viable alternative. The SB is recommended as the primary surgical intervention for patients with syndesmotic ankle fractures due to its superior clinical benefits when compared to TTC and SS.Levels of Evidence:3.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.