Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Moderate correlation exists between radiological and functional outcomes in acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvementRadiological Outcomes Linked to Functional Recovery in Acetabular Fractures

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that moderate correlation exists between radiological and functional scores in acetabular fractures.

This meta-analysis evaluates the relationship between radiological outcomes and functional outcomes in 336 patients with acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate treated with open reduction and internal fixation. The study focuses on the correlation between MATTA scores (radiological) and MAP or HHS scores (functional).

Key findings indicate that 66% of patients achieved excellent MATTA scores, while 41% achieved excellent MAP scores and 47% achieved excellent HHS scores. The analysis found a 51% overall agreement between MAP and MATTA (95% CI 29-71%, I2=85%) and a 58% overall agreement between HHS and MATTA (95% CI 46-71%, I2=43%). Meta-regression for predictors identified no significant predictors.

The authors note that the moderate associations observed suggest that anatomic reduction alone may not determine treatment success. Furthermore, the lack of strong correlation between MAP and MATTA scores suggests limitations in current functional assessment tools. Clinicians should consider that while anatomic reduction is a primary goal, the role of rigid fixation may be significant. The findings suggest that radiological success does not always translate directly to functional outcomes in this fracture population.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses the assessment of outcomes in acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. It complements previous findings regarding the management of acetabular fractures, such as the observation that primary arthroplasty beats ORIF for function in geriatric patients and that ORIF is linked to higher reoperation risk in older patients. This study specifically highlights the moderate correlation between radiological and functional scores, suggesting that anatomical success may not perfectly predict functional outcomes.

Researchers analyzed data from 336 patients who suffered from acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. These patients underwent a surgical procedure called open reduction and internal fixation to repair the bone. The study looked at the relationship between the physical alignment of the bone (radiological outcomes) and the patients' ability to move and function (functional outcomes).

The results showed that 66% of patients had excellent radiological outcomes. However, the link between these physical measurements and functional scores was only moderate. For example, while many patients had good physical alignment, the tools used to measure their movement and function did not always match the physical measurements perfectly.

Because the link between these two types of scores was not very strong, experts suggest that simply getting the bone to look correct on an X-ray might not be the only factor in determining a successful recovery. Patients and doctors should note that while bone alignment is a primary goal, other factors like stable fixation also play a role in long-term mobility.

What this means for you:
While bone alignment is important, it does not always perfectly predict how well a patient will move after surgery.

Common questions

How well did the surgery align the bones?

The study found that 66% of the 336 patients had excellent radiological outcomes, while 27% had good results and 7% had poor results regarding the physical alignment of the fracture.

How did patients perform after surgery?

Regarding functional scores, 41% of the 177 patients had excellent scores and 47% had good scores. For the 217 patients measured with HHS scores, 47% were excellent and 31% were good.

Does a perfect X-ray mean a perfect recovery?

The study found only a moderate association between the physical alignment and functional scores. This suggests that while getting the bone to look correct is a primary goal, it may not be the only factor that determines how well a patient moves.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 336
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: Quadrilateral plate fractures are complex injuries often requiring surgical management. Nevertheless, postoperative reduction quality has not been consistently correlated with functional outcome. We conducted a meta-analysis evaluating the association between functional and radiological outcomes of patients with acetabular fracture involving the quadrilateral plate who were treated surgically with open reduction and internal fixation. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases was performed to identify prospective and retrospective studies reporting the functional and radiological outcomes after internal fixation of acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement. Literature screening was based on eligibility criteria, extracted relevant data and on the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis evaluated functional (Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel (MAP)) outcomes as well as radiological (MATTA) outcomes, pooling agreement proportions, assessing heterogeneity, and performing meta-regression using R. RESULTS: We included 12 studies with 336 patients treated for acetabular fracture involving the quadrilateral plate. Seven studies (177 patients) reported MAP scores: excellent 41%, good 47%, poor 12%. Seven studies (217 patients) reported HHS scores: excellent 47%, good 31%, poor 22%. Overall, MATTA scores in 336 patients were excellent 66%, good 27%, poor 7%. Agreement between MAP and MATTA was 51% overall (95% CI 29-71%, I2=85%), 53% excellent vs good, 95% excellent vs poor, and 71% good vs poor. Agreement between HHS and MATTA was 58% overall (95% CI 46-71%, I2=43%), 65% excellent vs good, 70% good vs poor, and 90% excellent vs poor. Meta-regression found no significant predictors. CONCLUSION: Association was observed between postoperative radiological outcomes and functional outcomes (MAP, HHS) in acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate, particularly when scoring was excellent versus poor, underscoring the importance of anatomic reduction as a primary management goal. However, the moderate associations identified suggest that anatomic reduction alone may not determine treatment success, highlighting the role of rigid fixation. The lack of strong correlation between MAP and MATTA scores raises concerns about the adequacy of commonly used functional assessment tools. Further research is warranted to refine evaluation methods and identify predictors of long-term functional recovery in acetabular fracture management.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.