Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Prophylactic ciNPWT may shorten hospital stay but evidence for infection reduction is not statistically significantNew wound therapy may shorten hospital stays for hernia repairs

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that ciNPWT may reduce hospital stay, but evidence for reduced infection risk is not statistically significant.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) compared to conventional sterile dressings in 420 patients undergoing open ventral incisional hernia repair with mesh. The analysis focused on surgical site infection (SSI) incidence, seroma incidence, and length of hospital stay.

Regarding SSI, ciNPWT showed a trend toward risk reduction (RR=0.52 fixed-effect; RR=0.55 random-effects), but these results were not statistically significant (P=0.06 for fixed-effect; P=0.25 for random-effects). No significant difference was found for seroma incidence (RR=0.83; P=0.61). However, ciNPWT was associated with a reduction in postoperative hospital stay (MD=-1.02 days; P=0.0007).

The authors note several limitations, including a small number of included studies (k=4). The SSI results were heavily influenced by a single trial, and the finding regarding hospital stay was based on only two studies and driven primarily by one trial. Consequently, the GRADE certainty of evidence is low for SSI and very low for seroma and hospital stay. Clinical conclusions regarding infection reduction are not definitive, and the observed benefit in hospital stay requires further confirmation.

When patients undergo surgery to repair a ventral incisional hernia, the recovery process is critical. Doctors are looking at a specific method called closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT). This technique uses a specialized dressing to manage the wound site after the surgery is finished.

Researchers looked at data from 420 patients to see if this method worked better than standard sterile dressings. The results showed that patients using the special wound therapy stayed in the hospital for about one day less on average. However, while the data suggested it might lower the risk of surgical site infections, the results were not strong enough to be certain.

It is important to note that the evidence is currently limited. The study only included four trials, and the findings regarding shorter hospital stays were based on just two of those trials. Because the evidence is low to very low certainty, doctors cannot yet say for sure if this method is a definitive way to prevent infections or speed up recovery.

What this means for you:
Specialized wound therapy may shorten hospital stays after hernia surgery, but more research is needed to confirm results.

Common questions

Can this treatment help me get home from the hospital sooner?

The study found that patients using the special wound therapy stayed in the hospital for about 1.02 days less on average. However, because this finding was based on only two studies, the evidence is considered very low certainty, and more research is needed to confirm if this happens consistently.

Does this method reduce the risk of infection after surgery?

The data showed a trend toward fewer infections with the new wound therapy, but the results were not statistically significant. Because the results were heavily influenced by a single trial, the evidence for infection reduction is currently considered low certainty.

Is this treatment better than standard dressings for hernia repairs?

While the special wound therapy showed a trend toward fewer infections and shorter hospital stays, it did not show a significant difference in the number of seromas (fluid collections under the skin). Because of the small number of trials included, the evidence is not yet strong enough to make a definitive conclusion.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effects of prophylactic closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) on surgical site infection (SSI), seroma incidence and length of hospital stay after open ventral incisional hernia repair with mesh.MethodsFour databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched from inception to June 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic ciNPWT versus conventional sterile dressings in open ventral incisional hernia repair with mesh. The primary outcome was postoperative SSI incidence; secondary outcomes included seroma incidence and hospital stay. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 1.0), and meta-analysis was performed with both fixed-effect and random-effects models using RevMan software. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.ResultsFour RCTs involving 420 patients (208 in ciNPWT group, 212 in control group) were included. Under the fixed-effect model, ciNPWT tended to reduce SSI risk without statistical significance (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.26–1.04, P = 0.06, I2 = 50%). The random-effects model yielded a consistent but more conservative estimate (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.20–1.53, P = 0.25). No significant difference was found in seroma incidence (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.39–1.74, P = 0.61). ciNPWT was associated with shortened postoperative hospital stay (MD = −1.02 days, 95% CI −1.61 to −0.43, P = 0.0007), though this finding was based on only two studies and driven primarily by a single trial. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the SSI result was materially influenced by a single trial. Given the small number of included studies (k = 4), funnel plot asymmetry could not be reliably interpreted as evidence of publication bias. The GRADE certainty of evidence was rated as low for SSI and very low for seroma and hospital stay.ConclusionCurrent evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that prophylactic ciNPWT may be associated with shortened hospital stay after mesh-based ventral incisional hernia repair and shows a non-significant trend toward reducing SSI and seroma. However, the certainty of evidence is low to very low, the SSI result is materially dependent on a single trial, and the hospital stay finding is inconsistent across studies. Therefore, no definitive conclusion can be drawn regarding infection reduction, and the hospital stay benefit requires confirmation. More large-sample, multicenter, high-quality RCTs are needed for further validation.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.