Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Ovine Forestomach Matrix Grafts for Stage 3 and 4 Pressure InjuriesNew Graft Material Shows Promise for Hard-to-Heal Wounds

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider these preliminary findings as hypothesis-generating only; no comparator and small sample limit conclusions.

This prospective observational case series at a single level 1 trauma center included nine participants (eight men, one woman) with a total of 12 Stage 3 or 4 pressure injuries. Patients received ovine forestomach matrix (OFM)-based grafts; no comparator group was reported. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications, and secondary outcomes included time to granulation tissue coverage, time to fill, percent area reduction, and number of OFM applications. Follow-up duration was not reported.

No postoperative complications were observed. The median time to 50% granulation tissue coverage was 2.0 weeks (IQR: 1.5, 8.5), and the median time to complete granulation tissue coverage was 6.5 weeks (IQR: 2.0, 15.0). Tunneling or undermining was eradicated in 50% of pressure injuries. The mean percent area reduction at the last recorded visit was 61% (SD: 30%). Serious adverse events, discontinuations, and overall tolerability were not reported.

Key limitations include the small sample size (nine participants with 12 pressure injuries), absence of a comparator group, and lack of reported follow-up duration. As a single-center case series, these findings are descriptive and cannot establish efficacy or safety compared with standard care. The practice relevance is that OFM-based grafts may serve as an adjunct for surgically managing late-stage pressure injuries that are difficult to heal; however, clinicians should interpret these results cautiously and await comparative data.

A Tough Problem for Trauma Patients

Imagine lying in a hospital bed, unable to move much due to an injury. Over time, a painful sore develops on your skin. This is a pressure injury, also known as a bedsore. For trauma patients, these injuries can be deep and very hard to heal.

These wounds, called Stage 3 or 4 pressure injuries, damage not just the skin but also the tissue underneath. They can look like craters and often have tunnels under the surface. Standard treatments like surgery and special dressings don't always work.

This leaves patients and doctors searching for better options.

Pressure injuries are a huge problem in hospitals. They affect millions of people each year, especially those who are bedridden or can't move well. Trauma patients are at high risk because their injuries often limit movement and their bodies are under stress.

Stage 3 and 4 injuries are the most severe. They are painful, can lead to serious infections, and are very expensive to treat. Healing can take months, and sometimes the wounds don't close at all.

Current treatments often involve surgery to remove dead tissue and special dressings to help the wound heal from the inside out. But for many patients, this isn't enough. There's a clear need for something that can boost the body's natural healing process.

The Old Way vs. The New Way

Traditionally, surgeons focus on cleaning the wound (debridement) and using negative pressure wound therapy—a special vacuum dressing—to help close the wound. This is the standard approach.

But here’s the twist: what if you could give the body a scaffold to build new, healthy tissue on? That’s where this new study comes in.

Researchers tested a graft made from ovine forestomach matrix (OFM). This is a fancy term for a material derived from the first stomach of a sheep. It’s processed to create a natural, biodegradable scaffold that can be placed in a wound.

The idea isn't to replace surgery, but to add to it. The OFM graft is used alongside standard surgical methods to see if it can improve the quality of the tissue and speed up healing.

How It Works: A Natural Scaffold

Think of a deep wound like a construction site with a big hole. You can’t just pour concrete in and expect a solid building. You need a frame or scaffold to guide the new material into place.

The OFM graft acts like that scaffold. It’s placed in the wound bed after the surgeon has cleaned it. The graft provides a structure for the patient’s own cells to grow into. Over time, the body replaces the graft with its own new tissue.

It’s like giving the body a head start. The graft doesn’t become the final tissue; it just guides the healing process. This can lead to stronger, healthier tissue that’s better prepared for final closure or reconstruction.

This was a small, early-stage study at a single trauma center. Researchers enrolled nine patients (eight men, one woman) who had a total of 12 Stage 3 or 4 pressure injuries. The study followed these patients from July 2022 to July 2024.

All patients received the OFM graft as part of their surgical treatment. The main goal was to see if the graft was safe and if it helped reduce complications. Secondary goals included measuring how long it took for new tissue to cover the wound and how much the wound size shrank.

The results were encouraging. The graft appeared to be safe, with no postoperative complications reported in any of the patients.

More importantly, the wounds showed significant healing. On average, it took just two weeks for new, healthy tissue (called granulation tissue) to cover half of the wound. For complete coverage, the median time was about six and a half weeks.

This doesn’t mean this treatment is available yet.

The wounds also shrank significantly. At the last check-up, the average wound area had reduced by 61%. For patients with deep tunnels under the skin, half of those tunnels were completely filled in and healed.

This is a big deal because tunneling is one of the trickiest parts of healing these injuries.

But There’s a Catch

While these results are promising, it’s important to keep them in perspective. This was a very small study with only nine patients. It was also an observational study, meaning it didn’t compare the OFM graft to a control group getting standard treatment alone.

Larger, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and see how they stack up against current treatments.

This study adds to a growing body of research on using biological scaffolds to improve wound healing. For trauma surgeons, who often deal with complex wounds, this could be a valuable new tool. It suggests that OFM grafts may help create a better wound bed, which is crucial for successful reconstruction or closure down the line.

If you or a loved one is dealing with a severe pressure injury, this research offers a glimpse of a potential future option. However, this treatment is still in the research phase and not yet a standard part of care.

If you have a hard-to-heal wound, the best step is to talk to your doctor or wound care specialist about all available options, including clinical trials.

This study has several key limitations. It was small, with only nine patients, and conducted at a single hospital. There was no comparison group, so we can’t say for sure if the graft is better than standard care alone. The follow-up period was also relatively short for wound healing studies.

The next step is to conduct larger, more rigorous trials. Researchers will need to compare OFM grafts directly against standard treatments in a bigger group of patients. They’ll also need to follow patients for a longer time to see if the healing is durable.

If these early results hold up, OFM grafts could become a standard part of the toolkit for surgeons treating complex pressure injuries. For now, it’s a promising lead in the ongoing effort to help patients heal faster and more completely.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionStage 3 and 4 pressure injuries (PIs) pose significant challenges in trauma patients. Surgical management aims to support improvements in tissue vitality and often relies on debridement and negative pressure wound therapy. The use of ovine forestomach matrix (OFM)-based grafts to augment existing surgical approaches may improve tissue quality prior to reconstruction or closure by secondary intention.MethodsThis prospective observational study is part of a larger Institutional Review Board-approved study (Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical trial number: NCT05243966). The study enrolled patients with Stage 3 and 4 PIs between July 2022 and July 2024 at a single level 1 trauma center. The study’s primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative complications and secondary endpoints included time to granulation tissue coverage and/or fill, percent area reduction, and number of OFM applications.ResultsNine participants (eight men, one woman) with a total of 12 PIs (25% Stage 3 and 75% Stage 4) were enrolled in the study. The mean surface area was 46 ± 24 cm2, and 10 of the 12 enrolled PIs included areas of tunneling and/or undermining. The median time to 50% granulation tissue was 2.0 (IQR: 1.5, 8.5) weeks and the median time to complete granulation tissue coverage was 6.5 (IQR: 2.0, 15.0) weeks. Tunneling or undermining was eradicated in 50% of PIs. The mean percent area reduction at the last recorded visit was 61% ± 30%. There were no postoperative complications.ConclusionThese results suggest that OFM-based grafts may serve as a valuable adjunct for the surgical management of late-stage PIs that are clinically challenging to heal.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.