Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Single-incision modified Nuss procedure compared to non-flipping bar in pediatric pectus excavatum patients.

Single-incision modified Nuss procedure compared to non-flipping bar in pediatric pectus excavatum p…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider tailoring surgical selection for pectus excavatum to patient age and deformity characteristics based on this retrospective cohort.

This single-center retrospective cohort study included 171 pediatric and adolescent patients with pectus excavatum treated at Shanghai Children's Hospital. The population was divided into two groups: 140 patients underwent a single-incision modified Nuss procedure, while 31 patients received a modified Nuss procedure with a non-flipping bar. The primary outcome assessed was therapeutic efficacy, with secondary outcomes including operative time, number of incisions, screw fixation rate, Haller index, overall complication rates, and postoperative recovery indicators.

Results indicated that the non-flipping bar group had a longer median operative time and a higher number of incisions compared to the single-incision group. Additionally, the non-flipping bar group demonstrated a lower screw fixation rate and a higher median Haller index. However, there were no significant differences observed between the two groups regarding overall complication rates or postoperative recovery indicators. After propensity score matching, no statistical difference was found between the groups concerning surgical efficacy.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported for adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or general tolerability in this study. The follow-up period was described as short to intermediate-term. The study authors note that surgical selection should be tailored to patient age and deformity characteristics. Limitations inherent to the retrospective design and the single-center setting were not explicitly detailed beyond the study type classification.

The practice relevance suggests that clinicians should consider patient-specific factors such as age and the specific characteristics of the chest wall deformity when selecting between these surgical options. The evidence does not support a definitive superiority of one technique over the other for all patients based on efficacy or safety profiles in this specific cohort.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the clinical utility of two modified Nuss procedures in children and adolescents with pectus excavatum (PE), including single-incision modified Nuss and modified Nuss with non-flipping bar. It sought to delineate patient selection patterns, assess perioperative parameters, postoperative recovery, complication rates, and short/intermediate-term efficacy of the two approaches, thereby providing evidence-based guidance for individualized surgical selection.MethodsA single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on pediatric and adolescent PE patients who underwent surgical correction at Shanghai Children's Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients were categorized by the intended operative strategy: single-incision modified Nuss (single working incision with optional thoracoscopy through the same incision) versus modified Nuss with a pre-shaped non-flipping bar (advanced without intraoperative 180° turnover). A total of 171 patients were included (140 single-incision; 31 non-flipping bar). Demographic data, clinical characteristics, surgical parameters, and postoperative outcomes were collected.ResultsRegarding surgical parameters, the non-flipping bar group had longer median operative time, more incisions, and lower screw fixation rate. Postoperatively, the non-flipping bar group showed a higher median Haller index, but this difference had limited clinical significance. No significant differences were noted in overall complication rates, postoperative recovery indicators, or surgical efficacy. After PSM, no statistical difference in therapeutic efficacy was found between the two groups.ConclusionBoth the single-incision modified Nuss procedure and the modified Nuss procedure with non-flipping bar are effective and safe for PE in children and adolescents, with comparable therapeutic efficacy. Surgical selection should be tailored to patient age and deformity characteristics.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.