Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Narrative review examines ureteroscopy with negative-pressure suction sheath for kidney and ureteral stones

Narrative review examines ureteroscopy with negative-pressure suction sheath for kidney and…
Photo by Ousa Chea / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider standardized reporting of intrarenal pressure surrogates and suction variables for ureteroscopy.

This narrative review addresses the use of ureteroscopy combined with a negative-pressure suction sheath compared to ureteroscopy without the device for managing kidney and ureteral stones. The scope includes potential secondary outcomes such as stone-free rates, operative time, residual fragment burden, postoperative pain, ureteral injuries, and infectious complications including fever, SIRS, and sepsis. Specific numerical data regarding these outcomes were not reported in the provided source material.

The authors note that standardized reporting of intrarenal pressure surrogates, suction variable ranges, and comparison techniques used in conjunction with large-scale multicenter clinical trials are recommended. Additionally, cost-effectiveness analyses are suggested to facilitate widespread acceptance of these procedures within clinical practice.

Limitations of this narrative review include the lack of reported sample sizes, specific setting details, and quantitative safety data. The absence of explicit numerical results prevents definitive conclusions on efficacy or safety profiles based solely on this text. Clinicians should await data from large-scale multicenter clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses before adopting these techniques broadly.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Ureteroscopy, which is now one of the primary treatments for kidney and ureteral stones, can suffer from unstable vision due to debris and fluid retention, fragment and dust migration, and temporary increases in intrarenal pressure resulting in infectious complications in vulnerable patients. Negative-pressure suction sheaths were introduced as an aid to ureteroscopy to assist in evacuating debris and turbid irrigant while providing more consistent flow dynamics. These devices are intended to improve both the efficiency of the procedure and the physiological safety of the patients. This review will combine the current research on ureteroscopy using suction sheaths with the integration of device design, irrigation-suction coupling, technical standardization, and clinical outcome data. Stone characteristics, device specifications, irrigation/suction variables, and primary endpoint data including stone-free rates, operative time, residual fragment burden, postoperative pain, ureteral injuries, and infectious complications (fever, SIRS, sepsis) were extracted from all eligible studies. The evidence is presented within a mechanistic to outcome model, where suction-assisted flow improves optical clarity, facilitates fragment evacuation, and reduces pressure surges during high energy lithotripsy. The model also addresses tradeoffs related to mucosal collapse risks, ureteral wall stresses, and the requirement for parameter standardization. Suction-assisted ureteroscopy provides a systems-based approach to improving the safety and efficacy of endoscopic lithotripsy, potentially most beneficially applied to high-dusting cases, contaminated or obstructed collecting systems, and anatomically challenging situations. To facilitate the widespread acceptance of this technology, there should be standardized reporting of intrarenal pressure surrogates, suction variable ranges, and comparison techniques used in conjunction with large-scale multicenter clinical trials, and cost-effectiveness analyses.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.