Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

AI software modestly improves AUROC and reduces interpretation time in breast ultrasound reading

AI software modestly improves AUROC and reduces interpretation time in breast ultrasound reading
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret AI's modest AUROC gain and time savings cautiously without significant accuracy change.

In a retrospective multi-reader cohort study, six radiologists interpreted 258 breast ultrasound examinations (129 malignant and 129 benign lesions) with and without assistance from Vis-BUS, a commercial AI detection and analysis software. The study compared diagnostic performance and interpretation time between AI-assisted and unassisted reads.

With AI assistance, the pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) increased modestly from 0.921 to 0.953 (p = 0.002). Median interpretation time per case decreased from 6.0 to 3.0 seconds (p < 0.001). However, key diagnostic accuracy metrics showed no significant differences: accuracy was 79.1% vs. 83.9% (p = 0.061), sensitivity was 94.2% vs. 96.3% (p = 0.243), and specificity was 64.0% vs. 71.6% (p = 0.069).

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the retrospective design and the use of a multi-reader study with a washout period, which may not reflect real-world clinical workflow. The study demonstrates an association between AI use and improved AUROC with faster interpretation, but the lack of significant change in accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity suggests the clinical impact on diagnostic performance may be limited. Prospective studies are needed to determine if these findings translate to improved patient outcomes.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectivesTo evaluate whether Vis-BUS, a commercial artificial intelligence (AI) breast ultrasound detection and analysis software, improves diagnostic discrimination and interpretation efficiency in breast ultrasound examinations.Materials and methodsThis retrospective multi-reader study included 258 breast ultrasound examinations (129 malignant and 129 benign lesions). Six radiologists independently interpreted all cases without AI and, after a two-week washout, with AI assistance. Diagnostic performance metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, were compared using multi-reader analysis. Median interpretation time per case was recorded and compared using paired statistical tests.ResultsVis-BUS assistance modestly increased the pooled AUROC (0.921 vs. 0.953, p = 0.002) and reduced median reading time (6.0 vs. 3.0 s, p  0.06). Accuracy (79.1% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.061), sensitivity (94.2% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.243), and specificity (64.0% vs. 71.6%, p = 0.069) showed no significant differences. Median interpretation time decreased from 6.0 to 3.0 s (p 
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.