Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

CARTA reduces rerupture rates by 73% in patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptureNew Treatment Strategy Reduces Rerupture Rates for Achilles Tendon Tears

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that CARTA reduces rerupture rates by 73% but does not improve primary functional outcomes at 12 months.

This multicentre randomized controlled trial enrolled 300 adults with acute Achilles tendon rupture. Participants were allocated to three groups: Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm (CARTA), non-operative treatment, or operative treatment.

The CARTA group utilized ultrasound to determine surgical necessity based on specific overlap and elongation criteria. At 12 months, the primary outcome of Heel-Rise Work Test (HRWT) showed no significant between-group differences. However, secondary outcomes revealed that CARTA significantly reduced rerupture rates by 73% compared to non-operative treatment (3% vs 11%, p=0.03).

Additionally, the CARTA group showed an 8-point improvement in Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and a -2° improvement in Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA) compared to non-operative treatment. Notably, 36% fewer patients in the CARTA group required surgery compared to the standard operative treatment group.

While CARTA did not improve primary functional outcomes at 12 months, it demonstrated superior safety regarding rerupture rates and improved patient-reported scores. Clinical application may offer a more conservative surgical approach while maintaining high safety profiles for patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 300 adults with acute Achilles tendon ruptures. They compared the Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm (CARTA) against both non-operative treatment and standard surgery. CARTA uses ultrasound to determine if surgery is needed based on specific measurements of the tendon's overlap and length.

The study found that patients using the CARTA approach had a 73% lower rerupture rate compared to those receiving only non-operative care. Patients in the CARTA group also reported better scores on patient-reported outcome measures and showed improvements in resting angles. However, the trial did not find a significant difference in primary functional outcomes at the one-year mark between the different groups.

One important finding was that 36% fewer patients in the CARTA group required surgery compared to those receiving standard operative care. While the treatment did not change the final functional outcome for many, it significantly reduced the risk of a second tear and improved patient scores. These results suggest CARTA may be a useful way to manage recovery while minimizing unnecessary surgeries.

What this means for you:
The CARTA protocol reduces rerupture rates by 73% compared to non-operative care but does not change functional outcomes.

Common questions

How does the CARTA approach differ from standard care?

CARTA uses ultrasound to check if a tendon is stretched too much or has too little overlap. If these specific criteria are met, surgery is performed. This method resulted in 36% fewer surgeries than the standard operative treatment group.

Does this new method improve physical function?

The study found no significant difference in the primary functional outcome, which was the Heel-Rise Work Test at 12 months. While it improved patient-reported scores and reduced rerupture rates, it did not change the final functional results compared to other treatments.

Is there a lower risk of re-injury with CARTA?

Yes, the study showed that the CARTA group had a 73% lower rerupture rate than the non-operative group. Specifically, the rerupture rate was 3% in the CARTA group compared to 11% in the non-operative group.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 970
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up12.0 mo
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether individualised treatment using the Copenhagen Achilles Rupture Treatment Algorithm (CARTA) is superior to default operative or non-operative strategies. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled trial. Adults with acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomised (1:1:1) to individualised CARTA, non-operative or operative treatment. In the CARTA arm, surgery was indicated if ultrasound showed<25% tendon overlap or ≥7% elongation. The primary outcome was the Heel-Rise Work Test (HRWT) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included HRWT at 6 months, and at both 6 and 12 months, the Heel-Rise Height, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), Tegner activity scale, Copenhagen Achilles tendon Length Measure, Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA) and complication recordings. RESULTS: Between May 2018 and June 2023, 970 patients were screened; 300 were randomised (male/female 76%/24%, mean age 41 (SD 1)). At 12 months, data were available for 98 CARTA (64% operated), 100 non-operative and 97 operative patients. There were no significant between-group differences in HRWT at 12 months. However, CARTA significantly reduced rerupture rates by 73% compared with non-operative treatment (3% (95% CI) (1 to 8) vs 11% (6 to 19), p=0.03), improved ATRS by 8 points (1 to 15, p=0.02) and improved ATRA by -2° (-4 to -1), p=0.01). No difference between CARTA and operative treatment was found except 36% less underwent surgery. CONCLUSION: Individualised CARTA did not improve functional outcomes based on the HRWT at 12 months, but among secondary outcomes, it reduced rerupture rates and improved patient-reported outcomes compared with non-operative treatment and with fewer surgeries than routine operative care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03525964.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.