Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Detailed ultrasound significantly enhances positive predictive value for trisomies 18 and 13 after high-risk cfDNADetailed Ultrasound Improves Accuracy For High Risk Genetic Screen Results

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that adding detailed ultrasound significantly improves PPV for T18 and T13 following high-risk cfDNA results.

This meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic performance of detailed ultrasound (US) performed by experienced sonographers in singleton pregnancies that received high-risk cell-free DNA (cfDNA) results for Trisomy 21, 18, and 13. The analysis included 858 scans across 8 studies to determine if adding a physical examination improves the predictive value of genetic screening.

The meta-analysis found that detailed US demonstrated sensitivity rates of 75.9% for T21, 86.6% for T18, and 91.4% for T13. Specificity was high across all conditions: 95.1% for T21, 94.5% for T18, and 92.1% for T13. When combining US with cfDNA, the positive predictive value (PPV) improved by up to 12% for T21, 40% for T18, and 71% for T13 compared to cfDNA alone.

A primary limitation noted is that the risk of bias was highest in the index test domain because sonographers were often not blinded to the initial cfDNA results. Despite this, the findings suggest that while the additive value of ultrasound is more limited for T21 due to high baseline PPV, it provides significant clinical utility for confirming cases of T18 and T13.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in optimizing the management of singleton pregnancies with high-risk cfDNA results. It confirms that while cfDNA is a primary screening tool, detailed ultrasound serves as an effective secondary diagnostic step to improve positive predictive value, particularly for Trisomy 18 and Trisomy 13.

This review analyzed 858 scans across eight different studies. It looked at how adding a detailed ultrasound helps confirm results when a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test shows a high risk for specific conditions, including Trisomy 21, 18, and 13.

The findings show that combining these two tests improves the accuracy of the results. This improvement is especially large for Trisomy 18 and Trisomy 13. For Trisomy 21, the added value from an ultrasound is smaller because the initial DNA test is already quite accurate for that specific condition.

One reason to be cautious is that some researchers were aware of the DNA results before performing the ultrasound, which could affect how they interpreted the images. While the combination helps clarify results, it is not a replacement for clinical judgment. Patients should discuss these findings with their healthcare provider to understand what these numbers mean for their specific pregnancy.

What this means for you:
Adding an ultrasound to cell-free DNA testing can improve accuracy for Trisomy 18 and 13 results.

Common questions

How does ultrasound help after a high-risk DNA test?

When a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test shows a high risk for Trisomy 21, 18, or 13, adding a detailed ultrasound can improve the accuracy of that finding. This is because it provides extra information to help confirm the results before medical decisions are made.

Is the improvement the same for all conditions?

The improvement varies by condition. The combination of tests showed a 40% increase in accuracy for Trisomy 18 and a 71% increase for Trisomy 13. For Trisomy 21, the added value was smaller because the initial DNA test is already very accurate.

What are the limitations of this finding?

The study notes that some ultrasound operators knew the results of the DNA test before performing the scan. This could potentially affect how they interpreted the images, so it is important to discuss these results with your doctor.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of a detailed ultrasound (US) in pregnancies with high-risk cell-free DNA (cfDNA) results for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), and trisomy 13 (T13). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched up to April 2025. Singleton pregnancies with high-risk cfDNA for T21, T18, or T13 were included. The index test was a detailed US performed by experienced sonographers, and the reference standard was prenatal or postnatal karyotyping. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Data were extracted into 2 × 2 tables and pooled using a bivariate generalized linear mixed model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated in RevMan5. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527960). RESULTS: Eight studies encompassing 858 scans after high-risk cfDNA for T21, T18 and T13 were included. For T21, pooled US sensitivity and specificity were 75.9% (95% CI 64.8-84.4) and 95.1% (95% CI 79.4-98.9; τ = 0.146). For T18 and T13, pooled sensitivities were 86.6% (95% CI 76.3-92.8) and 91.4% (95% CI 75.3-97.4), with specificities of 94.5% (95% CI 78.5-98.7) and 92.1% (95% CI 76.8-97.6). Combining US with cfDNA significantly improved the absolute positive predictive value by up to 12% for T21, 40% for T18, and 71% for T13 compared with cfDNA alone. Risk of bias was highest in the index test domain, as operators were typically unblinded to cfDNA results. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed US shows excellent diagnostic accuracy for T18 and T13 after high-risk cfDNA results, markedly enhancing PPV. Conversely, since the PPV of cfDNA for T21 is already very high, the additive value of US for this condition is more limited although still helpful.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.