Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=5,611 Randomized Treatment

Surgery to Remove Sentinel Lymph Nodes With or Without Removing Lymph Nodes in the Armpit in Treating Women With Breast Cancer

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00003830 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
5,611
Serious AEs
0.3%
Results posted
Dec 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Shoulder Abduction Deficit — 276; 200 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
1,079citations · ~57 / year
Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial.
The Lancet. Oncology · 2007 · High-confidence link

Summary

RATIONALE: Removing the sentinel lymph nodes and examining them under a microscope may help plan more effective surgery for breast cancer. It is not yet known if surgery to remove the sentinel lymph nodes is more effective with or without removal of the lymph nodes in the armpit in treating breast cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of surgery to remove the sentinel lymph nodes with or without removal of lymph nodes in the armpit in treating women who have breast cancer.

Linked Publications (5)

  • Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology · 2007 · 1,079 citations · High-confidence link
  • Prerandomization Surgical Training for the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer.
    Annals of surgery · 2005 · 114 citations · Open access · High-confidence link
  • Metastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes: comparison of a limited widely spaced (NSABP protocol B-32) and a comprehensive narrowly spaced paraffin block sectioning strategy.
    The American journal of surgical pathology · 2009 · 60 citations · Open access · High-confidence link
  • Detection of occult sentinel lymph node micrometastases by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer. An NSABP protocol B-32 quality assurance study.
    Cancer · 2006 · 40 citations · Open access · High-confidence link
  • Effect of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine · 2011 · 435 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Shoulder Abduction Deficit
276; 200
PRIMARY
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Volume Difference
314; 192
PRIMARY
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Numbness
408; 103
PRIMARY
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Tingling
175; 90
PRIMARY
Overall Survival
91.8; 90.3
PRIMARY
Disease-free Survival as Measured by Breast Cancer Recurrence, Any Second Primary Cancer, and Death From Any Cause in Patients Without a Prior Event.
82.4; 81.5
SECONDARY
Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic Recurrence
92.5; 89.7
SECONDARY
The Percentage of Technically Successful Sentinel Node Resections as Measured by the Proportion of Patients for Whom at Least One Sentinel Node is Identified.
2672; 2707; 74; 83
SECONDARY
Sensitivity of the Sentinel Node to Determine Presence of Nodal Metastases.
75; 691

Eligibility Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Resectable invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast, confirmed by 1 of the following:
  • Histologically confirmed by core or open biopsy
  • Confirmed by fine needle aspiration cytology AND positive clinical breast examination and ultrasound or mammography
  • Clinically negative lymph nodes
  • No positive ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes
  • No prior removal of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes
  • No suspicious palpable nodes in the contralateral axilla or palpable supraclavicular or infraclavicular nodes, unless proven nonmalignant by biopsy
  • No ulceration, erythema, infiltration of the skin or underlying chest wall (complete fixation), peau d'orange, or skin edema of any magnitude
  • Tethering or dimpling of the skin or nipple inversion allowed
  • No bilateral malignancy or mass in the opposite breast that is suspicious for malignancy, unless proven nonmalignant by biopsy
  • No diffuse tumors or multiple malignant tumors in different quadrants of the breast
  • No other prior breast malignancy except lobular carcinoma in situ
  • No prior or concurrent breast implants
  • Hormone receptor status:
  • Not specified

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

  • 18 years and older

Sex:

  • Female

Menopausal status:

  • Not specified

Performance status:

  • Not specified

Life expectancy:

  • At least 10 years (excluding diagnosis of cancer)

Hematopoietic:

  • Not specified

Hepatic:

  • No hepatic systemic disease

Renal:

  • No renal systemic disease

Cardiovascular:

  • No cardiovascular systemic disease

Other:

  • No prior malignancy within past 5 years except:
  • Effectively treated squamous cell or basal cell skin cancer
  • Surgically treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • Surgically treated lobular carcinoma in situ of the ipsilateral or contralateral breast
  • No concurrent psychiatric or addictive disorder

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

  • No prior immunotherapy for this cancer

Chemotherapy:

  • No prior chemotherapy for this cancer, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

  • No prior hormonal therapy for this cancer

Radiotherapy:

  • No prior radiotherapy for this cancer

Surgery:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No prior breast reduction surgery
  • Prior excisional biopsy or lumpectomy allowed
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00003830) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search