Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=247 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Pioglitazone vs Vitamin E vs Placebo for Treatment of Non-Diabetic Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (PIVENS)

Liver Diseases

Enrolled (actual)
247
Serious AEs
7.7%
Results posted
Aug 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Improvement in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Defined by Change in Standardized Scoring of Liver Biopsies at Baseline and After 96 Weeks of Treatment. — 27; 36; 16 participants — p=0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Pioglitazone (Drug); Vitamin E (Dietary_supplement); Matching placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Primary completion
Jun 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Improvement in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Defined by Change in Standardized Scoring of Liver Biopsies at Baseline and After 96 Weeks of Treatment.
27; 36; 16 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Improvement in Steatosis
48; 43; 22 0.005 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Improvement in Lobular Inflammation
41; 43; 25 0.02 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Improvement in Hepatocellular Ballooning
31; 40; 21 0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis
31; 33; 22 0.24
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Resolution of Definite Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
33; 29; 15 0.05

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if therapy with pioglitazone or vitamin E will lead to an improvement in liver histology in non-diabetic adult patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Eligibility Criteria

  • Histologic evidence of NASH based on a liver biopsy obtained within 6 months of randomization.
  • Age 18 years or older
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00063622). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search