Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=862 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Comparison of Telavancin and Vancomycin for Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections With a Focus on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

Staphylococcal Skin Infection

Enrolled (actual)
862
Serious AEs
6.8%
Results posted
Dec 2009
Primary outcome: Primary: Clinical Response — 323; 321; 52; 58 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Telavancin (Drug); Vancomycin (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals
Primary completion
Jun 2006

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Clinical Response
323; 321; 52; 58; 23; 16

Summary

Study 0017 compares the safety and effectiveness of an investigational drug, telavancin, and an approved drug, vancomycin, for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients must have a diagnosis of one of the following complicated skin and skin structure infections with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) either suspected or confirmed as the major cause of the infection:
  • major abscess requiring surgical incision and drainage
  • infected burn (see exclusion criteria for important qualifications)
  • deep/extensive cellulitis
  • infected ulcer (see exclusion criteria for important qualifications)
  • wound infections
  • Patients must be expected to require at least 7 days of intravenous antibiotic treatment

Exclusion Criteria

  • Received more than 24 hours of potentially effective systemic (IV, IM or PO) antibiotic therapy prior to randomization
  • Burns involving > 20% of body surface area or third-degree/full-thickness in nature, diabetic foot ulcers, ischemic ulcers/wounds, necrotizing fascitis, gas gangrene, or mediastinitis.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00091819). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search