Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=81 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Continuous Levalbuterol for Treatment of Status Asthmaticus in Children

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00124176 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
81
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2013
Primary outcomePrimary: Duration of Continuous Therapy — 18.3; 16 Hours

Summary

This study will use a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial design in order to assess the safety and efficacy of levalbuterol (LEV) compared to racemic albuterol (RAC) when delivered continuously in a high-dose regimen for children with severe exacerbations of asthma. Primary hypothesis * Children with severe asthma receiving continuous levalbuterol will have a shorter duration of continuous therapy as compared to racemic albuterol. Secondary hypotheses * Children receiving continuous levalbuterol will have improved lung function measured by forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) as compared to racemic albuterol. * Children receiving continuous levalbuterol will have improved clinical asthma score as compared to racemic albuterol.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Duration of Continuous Therapy
18.3; 16
SECONDARY
Change in Pediatric Asthma Severity Score
-1.0; -0.64
SECONDARY
Heart Rate
132; 132
SECONDARY
Serum Potassium Levels
3.6; 3.6
SECONDARY
Serum Albuterol S Isomer Levels
5.5; 28.6

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 6-18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of asthma with two previous visits to emergency department (ED) or primary care provider for asthma care
  • Clinical decision by ED attending physician to begin continuous albuterol after standardized initial ED treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinical decision to begin continuous intravenous beta-agonist infusion (e.g. terbutaline)
  • Clinical decision to admit to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
  • Drug allergy or other contraindication to RAC or LEV
  • Other concurrent disease such as sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis, or cardiac disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Prior enrollment in the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00124176). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search