Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=298 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Aromasin Vs Arimidex Study As Initial Hormonal Therapy In Postmenopausal Women With Advanced/Recurrent Breast Cancer

Breast Neoplasms

Enrolled (actual)
298
Serious AEs
12.8%
Results posted
Jan 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Time to Progression (TTP) - Expert Evaluation Committee Assessment — 13.8; 11.1 months

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
exemestane (Drug); anastrozole (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 20+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Pfizer
Primary completion
Dec 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time to Progression (TTP) - Expert Evaluation Committee Assessment
13.8; 11.1
SECONDARY
Time to Progression (TTP) - Investigators Assessment
13.8; 13.7
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Objective Response - Investigators Assessment
2; 3; 56; 47; 58; 50
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit - Investigator Assessment
2; 3; 56; 47; 41; 49
SECONDARY
Overall Survival (OS)
NA; 60.1
SECONDARY
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
13.6; 11.1

Summary

To verify the non-inferiority of exemestane compared to anastrozole in time to tumor progression (TTP), the primary efficacy endpoint, in postmenopausal women with advanced/recurrent breast cancer.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have histologically or cytologically confirmed breast cancer at original diagnosis. At study entry, the patient must have metastatic progressive or locally recurrent inoperable breast cancer.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Having received any hormonal therapy (e.g., Tamoxifen, LHRH-agonists) ovariectomy or any chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent breast cancer
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00143390). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search